Cited by 77Bipolar Disorder and TreatmentTreatment of Major DepressionSchizophrenia research and treatment

Inositol augmentation of lithium or valproate for bipolar depression

A E, Evins, Demopulos, Christina, Yovel, Iftah, Culhane, Melissa, Ogutha, Jacqueline, Grandin, Louisa D, Nierenberg, Andrew A, Sachs, Gary S·2006·Bipolar Disorders

Abstract

Objective: Despite promising new therapies, bipolar depression remains difficult to treat. Up to half of patients do not respond adequately to currently approved treatments. This study evaluated the efficacy of adjunctive inositol for bipolar depression. Methods: Seventeen participants with DSM‐IV criteria for bipolar depression and a 17‐item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) ≥15 on proven therapeutic levels of lithium or valproate for >2 weeks were randomized to receive double‐blind inositol or placebo for 6 weeks. At the end of double‐blind treatment, subjects were eligible for an 8‐week open‐label trial of inositol. Results: Response was defined a priori as >50% reduction in the HRSD and a Clinical Global Impression of 1–2. Four of nine subjects (44%) on inositol and zero of eight subjects on placebo met response criteria (p = 0.053). There was no difference between groups in the average change score for the HRSD or Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS). Response to inositol was highly variable. Of nine subjects randomized to inositol, two had >50% worsening in HRSD scores at the end of treatment, three had no change and four had >50% improvement. Those who had worsening in depressive symptoms on inositol had significantly higher scores at baseline on the YMRS total score and irritability, disruptive/aggressive behavior and unkempt appearance items. Conclusions: There was a trend for more subjects on inositol to show improvement in bipolar depression symptoms, but, on average, inositol was not more effective than placebo as an adjunct for bipolar depression. Baseline levels of anger or hostility may be predictive of clinical response to inositol.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1399-5618.2006.00303.x

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
A E, E., Demopulos, C., Yovel, I., Culhane, M., Ogutha, J., Grandin, L. D., Nierenberg, A. A., & Sachs, G. S.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
Bipolar Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2006-03-15
Volume
8
Issue
2
Pages
168-174
ISSN
  • 1398-5647 (ISSN-L)
  • 1399-5618
OpenAlex
W2107762716
Cited by
77
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 8
FWCI
2.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Bipolar Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Stanley Medical Research Institute
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Bipolar Disorder and Treatment
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Treatment of Major Depression
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
myo-inositol, bipolar depression, lithium, valproic acid, adjunctive therapy, treatment-resistant depression, irritability, anger, hostility, treatment response prediction, mood stabilizers
MeSH terms
Adult, Antidepressive Agents, Bipolar Disorder, Double-Blind Method, Female, Humans, Inositol, Male, Middle Aged, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sensitivity and Specificity, Severity of Illness Index, Antipsychotic Agents, Valproic Acid, Lithium Carbonate, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review