The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Hepatic MRI for Fat Quantitation: Its Relationship to Fat Morphology, Diagnosis, and Ultrasound
Abstract
PURPOSE: The value of MRI and ultrasound in quantifying hepatic steatosis is assessed and the results compared with those obtained by liver biopsies. METHODS: A total of 38 patients undergoing hepatic biopsy for a variety of liver diseases were recruited for this study. Hepatic fat morphology and severity were assessed visually in each biopsy specimen. Steatosis pattern included macrovesicular, microvesicular, or mixed. The severity of hepatic steatosis was assessed by MRI through chemical shift imaging (n = 38) and by ultrasound through echogenicity (n = 31). RESULTS: MRI had a better correlation than ultrasound for microscopic fat content (r = 0.77, P < 0.001 vs. r = 0.41, P < 0.05). In macrovesicular steatosis, MRI and ultrasound both correlated well with microscopic fat content (r = 0.92, P < 0.001 vs. r = 0.90, P < 0.001). In nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, ultrasound revealed severe steatosis in all instances, but MRI fat content ranged greatly (19%-40%). In diagnoses excluding nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, increasing ultrasound severity did not correspond to advanced MRI fat content. CONCLUSION: Hepatic MRI and ultrasound are both useful in identifying heavy fat accumulation associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. MRI is superior to ultrasound in detecting and quantifying minor degrees of fatty metamorphosis in the liver.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
A pilot study of pioglitazone treatment for nonalcoholic steatohepatitis
Promrat, K., Lutchman, G., Uwaifo, G. I., Freedman, R. J., Soza, A., Heller, T., Doo, E., Ghany, M., Premkumar, A., Park, Y., et al. (2004) · Hepatology · doi:10.1002/hep.20012 · Cited by 726
Cited by
EASL–EASD–EASO Clinical Practice Guidelines for the management of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease
(2016) · Journal of Hepatology · doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2015.11.004 · Cited by 4,836
Inhibition of microsomal triglyceride transfer protein in familial hypercholesterolemia
Cuchel, M., Bloedon, L. T., Szapary, P. O., Kolansky, D. M., Wolfe, M. L., Sarkis, A., Millar, J. S., Ikewaki, K., Siegelman, E. S., Gregg, R. E., et al. (2007) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa061189 · Cited by 580
Kwok, R., Tse, Y. ‐., Wong, G. L. ‐., Ha, Y., Lee, A. U., Ngu, M. C., Chan, H. L. ‐., & Wong, V. W. ‐. (2014) · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1111/apt.12569 · Cited by 405
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease in adults: current concepts in etiology, outcomes, and management
Marjot, T., Moolla, A., Cobbold, J. F., Hodson, L., & Tomlinson, J. W. (2020) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/endrev/bnz009 · Cited by 228
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease
Erickson, S. K. (2009) · Journal of Lipid Research · doi:10.1194/jlr.r800089-jlr200 · Cited by 194
Metadata
- Authors
- Fishbein, M., Castro, F., Cheruku, S., Jain, S., Webb, B., Gleason, T., & Stevens, W. R.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology
- Published
- 2005-08
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 619-625
- ISSN
- 0192-0790 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2000924423
- Cited by
- 277
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 8.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Hepatic MRI for Fat Quantitation: Its Relationship to Fat Morphology, Diagnosis, and Ultrasound. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004836-200508000-00012
- The paper
- Fishbein, M., Castro, F., Cheruku, S., Jain, S., Webb, B., Gleason, T., & Stevens, W. R. (2005). Hepatic MRI for Fat Quantitation: Its Relationship to Fat Morphology, Diagnosis, and Ultrasound. Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-200508000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.