The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Abstract
Morality and ethical theory types of ethical theory the principle of respect for autonomy the principle of nonmaleficence the principle of beneficence the principle of justice professional-patient relationships ideals, virtues and conscientiousness.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015
Bossaert, L. L., Perkins, G. D., Askitopoulou, H., Raffay, V. I., Greif, R., Haywood, K. L., Mentzelopoulos, S. D., Nolan, J. P., Van de Voorde, P., Xanthos, T. T., et al. (2015) · Resuscitation · doi:10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.033 · Cited by 625
A critical analysis of evaluation practice: the Kirkpatrick model and the principle of beneficence
Bates, R. (2004) · Evaluation and Program Planning · doi:10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2004.04.011 · Cited by 623
Abràmoff, M. D., Tobey, D., & Char, D. S. (2020) · American Journal of Ophthalmology · doi:10.1016/j.ajo.2020.02.022 · Cited by 140
How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence?
Larcher, V., & Hutchinson, A. (2009) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2008.148676 · Cited by 83
Ethics, Methods, and Measures in Intimate Partner Violence Research: The Current State of the Field
Bender, A. K. (2017) · Violence Against Women · doi:10.1177/1077801216658977 · Cited by 80
Metadata
- Authors
- Beauchamp, T. L., & Childless, J. F.
- Venue
- International Clinical Psychopharmacology
- Published
- 1991
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 129-130
- ISSN
- 0268-1315 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3023095774
- Cited by
- 960
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 23.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Principles of Biomedical Ethics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004850-199100620-00013
- The paper
- Beauchamp, T. L., & Childless, J. F. (1991). Principles of Biomedical Ethics. International Clinical Psychopharmacology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004850-199100620-00013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
