The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence?
Abstract
Competence is an essential legal requirement for valid consent to medical treatment. Children under 16 may be considered 'Gillick competent' to make treatment decisions, but may need to demonstrate this. Applied tests for competence are wide-ranging and context dependent. Competence is related to cognitive ability and experience and may be enhanced by education, encouragement etc.; there is a general duty for professionals to enhance the competence of children in their care. The need to assess a child's competence may occur when s/he wishes to make a controversial decision whose wisdom others dispute. Potential assessors should have the necessary practical skills and an understanding of the child in their social and medical context. Assessments should be developmentally appropriate, explore systemic influences, and consider the child's emotional state, cognitive development and ability to balance risks and benefits. The involvement of a psychologist or other independent third party should be considered in cases that raise serious concerns about competency, or that involve complex decisions or conflict between the various parties. In rare cases courts may be involved.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Well-elaborated checklists that offer guidelines for good practice do exist [7, 19]; however, the last one was written half a decade ago and systematic research data to underpin these guidelines are not available.”
From Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence? (2015) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“Besides, children’s competence relies on optimal information provision that enhances their understanding.”
From Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence? (2015) · cites this paper as [19]
In the citing paper
“Apart from cognitive abilities, competence in children is thought to be related to life experience: children who have personal experiences with illness may show greater insight and understanding than children of comparable age who lack this experience [11, 18, 19].”
From Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence? (2015) · cites this paper as [19]
Citations
Cites
United Nations: Convention on the Rights of the Child
Cohen, C. P. (1989) · International Legal Materials · doi:10.1017/s0020782900017228 · Cited by 1,163
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childless, J. F. (1991) · International Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/00004850-199100620-00013 · Cited by 960
Handbook of pediatric psychology
(1988) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.26-2400 · Cited by 799
The Competency of Children and Adolescents to Make Informed Treatment Decisions
Weithorn, L. A., & Campbell, S. B. (1982) · Child Development · doi:10.2307/1130087 · Cited by 688
Tests of competency to consent to treatment
(1977) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.134.3.279 · Cited by 659
McCabe, M. A. (1996) · Journal of Pediatric Psychology · doi:10.1093/jpepsy/21.4.505 · Cited by 243
Children as partners with adults in their medical care
Alderson, P. (2006) · Archives of Disease in Childhood · doi:10.1136/adc.2005.079442 · Cited by 176
Alonzi, A., & Pringle, M. (2007) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.39372.691076.80 · Cited by 156
Re T (Adult: Refusal of Medical Treatment)
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 123
Cited by
Why is it hard to make progress in assessing children's decision-making competence?
Hein, I. M., Troost, P. W., Broersma, A., de Vries, M. C., Daams, J. G., & Lindauer, R. J. L. (2015) · BMC Medical Ethics · doi:10.1186/1472-6939-16-1 · Cited by 191
“Well-elaborated checklists that offer guidelines for good practice do exist [7,19]; however, the last one was written half a decade ago and systematic research data to underpin these guidelines are not available.”
BackgroundInfluentialGillick competence: an inadequate guide to the ethics of involving adolescents in decision-making
Bart, A., Hall, G. A., & Gillam, L. (2024) · Journal of Medical Ethics · doi:10.1136/jme-2023-108930 · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Larcher, V., & Hutchinson, A.
- Affiliations
- Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Larcher, V.
- Venue
- Archives of Disease in Childhood
- Publisher
- BMJ
- Published
- 2009-11-29
- Volume
- 95
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 307-11
- ISSN
- 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
- 1468-2044
- OpenAlex
- W2040964033
- Cited by
- 83
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
- FWCI
- 1.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
- Keywords
- Gillick competence, child consent, competency assessment, pediatricians, informed consent, children's decision-making, cognitive development, risk-benefit assessment, psychological assessment
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Choice Behavior, Ethics, Medical, United Kingdom, Humans, Informed Consent, Pediatrics, Mental Competency, Comprehension
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.2008.148676
- The paper
- Larcher, V., & Hutchinson, A. (2009). How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence? Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.148676
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.