Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 17 of the 17 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence?

Larcher, V., Hutchinson, A.·2009·Archives of Disease in Childhood

Abstract

Competence is an essential legal requirement for valid consent to medical treatment. Children under 16 may be considered 'Gillick competent' to make treatment decisions, but may need to demonstrate this. Applied tests for competence are wide-ranging and context dependent. Competence is related to cognitive ability and experience and may be enhanced by education, encouragement etc.; there is a general duty for professionals to enhance the competence of children in their care. The need to assess a child's competence may occur when s/he wishes to make a controversial decision whose wisdom others dispute. Potential assessors should have the necessary practical skills and an understanding of the child in their social and medical context. Assessments should be developmentally appropriate, explore systemic influences, and consider the child's emotional state, cognitive development and ability to balance risks and benefits. The involvement of a psychologist or other independent third party should be considered in cases that raise serious concerns about competency, or that involve complex decisions or conflict between the various parties. In rare cases courts may be involved.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1136/adc.2008.148676

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 17 references

Cited by

See all 83

Metadata

Authors
Larcher, V., & Hutchinson, A.
Affiliations
Great Ormond Street Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Larcher, V.
Venue
Archives of Disease in Childhood
Publisher
BMJ
Published
2009-11-29
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
307-11
ISSN
  • 0003-9888 (ISSN-L)
  • 1468-2044
OpenAlex
W2040964033
Cited by
83
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Archives of Disease in Childhood (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Children's Rights and Participation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
Gillick competence, child consent, competency assessment, pediatricians, informed consent, children's decision-making, cognitive development, risk-benefit assessment, psychological assessment
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Age Factors, Child, Child, Preschool, Choice Behavior, Ethics, Medical, United Kingdom, Humans, Informed Consent, Pediatrics, Mental Competency, Comprehension

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1136/adc.2008.148676
The paper
Larcher, V., & Hutchinson, A. (2009). How should paediatricians assess Gillick competence? Archives of Disease in Childhood. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.148676

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.