The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Effects of modulators of the renin???angiotensin???aldosterone system on cough
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of cough in patients with a history of angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor-related cough who received losartan [a type 1 angiotensin II (Ang II) receptor antagonist], lisinopril (an ACE inhibitor) or hydrochlorothiazide (a diuretic). DESIGN: An international, multicentre, randomized double-blind, parallel-group controlled trial. SETTING: Outpatient clinics at 20 tertiary care medical centres in 11 countries. PATIENTS: One hundred and thirty-five patients with uncomplicated primary hypertension with a history of ACE inhibitor-related cough were randomly assigned to the double-blind treatment phase and completed the study. INTERVENTION: After confirming that the cough was ACE inhibitor-related by a single-blind rechallenge, followed by a placebo washout period, patients were randomly assigned to receive 50mg losartan, 20mg lisinopril or 25mg hydrochlorothiazide once a day for 8 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cough incidence, severity and frequency were assessed by a self-administered questionnaire and a visual analogue scale. RESULTS: The percentage of patients who complained of cough was significantly higher with lisinopril than with losartan or hydrochlorothiazide. The mean visual analogue scale scores for patients treated with lisinopril demonstrated that these patients coughed more frequently than those who received losartan or hydrochlorothiazide. CONCLUSION: The incidence of cough related to the type 1 Ang II receptor antagonist losartan is significantly lower than that observed with lisinopril, and similar to that observed with hydrochlorothiazide in patients with a rechallenged ACE inhibitor cough. Type 1 Ang II receptor antagonists represent a potential new treatment for hypertensive patients in whom ACE inhibitors are indicated, but who develop a cough with these agents.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Drug Allergy: An Updated Practice Parameter
(2010) · Annals of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.anai.2010.08.002 · Cited by 957
Forette, F. (2002) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinte.162.18.2046 · Cited by 898
Angiotensin II receptor antagonists
Burnier, M., & Brunner, H. (2000) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)10365-9 · Cited by 707
Self-citationManaging Cough as a Defense Mechanism and as a Symptom
Irwin, R. S., Boulet, L.-P., Cloutier, M. M., Fuller, R., Gold, P. M., Hoffstein, V., Ing, A. J., McCool, F. D., O’Byrne, P., Poe, R. H., et al. (1998) · Chest · doi:10.1378/chest.114.2_supplement.133s · Cited by 648
Self-citationAngiotensin Receptors and Their Antagonists
Goodfriend, T. L., Elliott, M. E., & Catt, K. J. (1996) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm199606203342507 · Cited by 558
Metadata
- Authors
- Lacourci??re, Y., Brunner, H., Irwin, R., Karlberg, B. E., Ramsay, L. E., Snavely, D. B., Dobbins, T. W., Faison, E. P., & Nelson, E. B.
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 1994-12
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1387???1394
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1996690106
- Cited by
- 216
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of modulators of the renin???angiotensin???aldosterone system on cough. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004872-199412000-00012
- The paper
- Lacourci??re, Y., Brunner, H., Irwin, R., Karlberg, B. E., Ramsay, L. E., Snavely, D. B., Dobbins, T. W., Faison, E. P., & Nelson, E. B. (1994). Effects of modulators of the renin???angiotensin???aldosterone system on cough. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199412000-00012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.