The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effectiveness of nifedipine treatment in elderly hypertensives. METHODS: A single-blind trial was conducted under the direction of the Shanghai Institute of Hypertension in 1632 subjects aged 60-79 years alternatively allocated to either nifedipine or placebo after a 4-week placebo run-in period between 1987 and 1990 with mean follow-up of 30 months. Clinical events and risk modification were analysed in collaboration with the University of Montreal. Seventy-four patients with severe hypertension were reallocated to active nifedipine treatment after placebo run-in. RESULTS: Cox's proportional hazards model accounting for covariates demonstrated a highly significant decrease in the probability of events: 'original treatment assignment' analysis indicated that 77 events occurred in the placebo and 32 in the nifedipine group. Similar significances were achieved with 'actual treatment' or 'changes excluded' (excluding reallocated subjects) analyses. A significant reduction in relative risk was observed for strokes and severe arrhythmia with an overall decrease from 1.0 to 0.41 (95% confidence interval 0.27-0.61). CONCLUSION: Nifedipine treatment diminished the number of severe clinical outcomes in elderly hypertensives significantly.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mancia, G., Fagard, R., Narkiewicz, K., Redón, J., Zanchetti, A., Böhm, M., Christiaens, T., Cifkova, R., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., et al. (2013) · Journal of Hypertension · doi:10.1097/01.hjh.0000431740.32696.cc · Cited by 5,655
Ettehad, D., Emdin, C. A., Kiran, A., Anderson, S. G., Callender, T., Emberson, J., Chalmers, J., Rodgers, A., & Rahimi, K. (2016) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(15)01225-8 · Cited by 3,755
Staessen, J. A., Fagard, R., Thijs, L., Celis, H., Arabidze, G. G., Birkenhäger, W. H., Bulpitt, C. J., de Leeuw, P. W., Dollery, C. T., Fletcher, A. E., et al. (1997) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(97)05381-6 · Cited by 2,989
Authors/Task Force Members:, Mancia, G., De Backer, G., Dominiczak, A., Cifkova, R., Fagard, R., Germano, G., Grassi, G., Heagerty, A. M., Kjeldsen, S. E., et al. (2006) · European Heart Journal · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehm236 · Cited by 2,384
Hansson, L., Lindholm, L. H., Ekbom, T., Dahlöf, B., Lanke, J., Scherstén, B., Wester, P.-O., Hedner, T., & de Faire, U. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)10327-1 · Cited by 1,447
Metadata
- Authors
- Gong, L., Zhang, W., Zhu, Y., Zhu, J., kong, D., Pag??, V., Ghadirian, P., LeLorier, J., & Hamet, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Hypertension
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1237-1245
- ISSN
- 0263-6352 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2416538760
- Cited by
- 412
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 28.91
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00004872-199610000-00013
- The paper
- Gong, L., Zhang, W., Zhu, Y., Zhu, J., kong, D., Pag??, V., Ghadirian, P., LeLorier, J., & Hamet, P. (1996). Shanghai trial of nifedipine in the elderly. Journal of Hypertension. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004872-199610000-00013
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.