Cited by 19Pain Management and Placebo EffectSleep and Wakefulness ResearchNeural dynamics and brain function

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHIC CHANGES IN ANIMALS UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF HYPNOSIS

SCHWARZ, BERT E., BICKFORD, REGINALD G.·1956·The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Abstract

2Fellow in Psychiatry, Mayo Foundation 3Section of Physiology, Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation 4The Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minnesota, is a part of the Graduate School of the University of Minnesota

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005053-195611000-00001

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 19

Metadata

Authors
SCHWARZ, B. E., & BICKFORD, R. G.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Venue
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
1956-11
Volume
124
Issue
5
Pages
433-439
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072177970
Cited by
19
References
0
Citations by year
2022: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Pain Management and Placebo Effect
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Sleep and Wakefulness Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural dynamics and brain function
Keywords
hypnosis, EEG changes, brain electrical activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Electroencephalography, Humans, Hypnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review