The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The Terms of Agreement: Indexing Epistemic Authority and Subordination in Talk-in-Interaction
Heritage, J., & Raymond, G. (2005) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.1177/019027250506800103 · Cited by 1,748
Epistemics in Action: Action Formation and Territories of Knowledge
Heritage, J. (2012) · Research on Language and Social Interaction · doi:10.1080/08351813.2012.646684 · Cited by 1,639
Some Further Steps in Narrative Analysis
Labov, W. (1997) · Journal of Narrative and Life History · doi:10.1075/jnlh.7.1-4.49som · Cited by 935
Quality control in qualitative research
Stiles, W. B. (1993) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/0272-7358(93)90048-q · Cited by 832
Question Asking During Tutoring
Graesser, A. C., & Person, N. K. (1994) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312031001104 · Cited by 900
Metadata
- Authors
- Gross, H. S.
- Venue
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
- Published
- 1978-12
- Volume
- 166
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 897-900
- ISSN
- 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1987137432
- Cited by
- 926
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005053-197812000-00014
- The paper
- Gross, H. S. (1978). Therapeutic Discourse: Psychotherapy as Conversation. The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005053-197812000-00014
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
