Cited by 71Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentStudent Stress and CopingPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

Life Change Events among Adolescents: An Empirical Consideration of Some Methodological Issues

NEWCOMB, MICHAEL D., HUBA, G J, BENTLER, P M·1986·The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease

Abstract

Recent critiques in the stress literature have identified several methodological shortcomings, including ignoring control over event occurrence, the confounding of life event and outcome measures, the lack of consistent and reliable measures, and few cross-validational studies. Each of these problems is addressed empirically by examining two independent samples of adolescents. A 39-item life event measure, developed previously in one sample of 1018 adolescents, was administered to a second sample of 376 teenagers. Second-order factors of six stress scales were clustered into controllable and uncontrollable events, both of which were related to psychological distress. Poor health was significantly related to an uncontaminated factor of uncontrollable events. Means and covariances of the seven stress factors were compared between the derivation sample and an age-matched subset of the cross-validation sample. Correlates of the scales with drug use and personality revealed interpretable associations within the cross-validation sample and were quite similar to those in the original sample. Finally, few sex differences were evident, whereas scores on controllable events scales increased with age.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005053-198605000-00004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The four symptom items come from the Bentler Medical and Psychological Functioning Inventory depression scale, reported to have strong reliability (.72) in adolescents.

    “These items are derived from the Bentler Medical and Psychological Functioning Inventory’s depression scale [26] which exhibits strong reliability (.72) in adolescent samples [27].”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
NEWCOMB, M. D., HUBA, G. J., & BENTLER, P. M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Venue
The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
Published
1986-05
Volume
174
Issue
5
Pages
280-289
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2053015276
Cited by
71
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 4
FWCI
10.38
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA01070)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
life change events, adolescents, stress, controllable events, uncontrollable events, psychological distress, cross-validation, drug use, personality, age differences, sex differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Age Factors, Female, Health Status, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Personality, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Substance-Related Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review