Life Change Events among Adolescents: An Empirical Consideration of Some Methodological Issues
Abstract
Recent critiques in the stress literature have identified several methodological shortcomings, including ignoring control over event occurrence, the confounding of life event and outcome measures, the lack of consistent and reliable measures, and few cross-validational studies. Each of these problems is addressed empirically by examining two independent samples of adolescents. A 39-item life event measure, developed previously in one sample of 1018 adolescents, was administered to a second sample of 376 teenagers. Second-order factors of six stress scales were clustered into controllable and uncontrollable events, both of which were related to psychological distress. Poor health was significantly related to an uncontaminated factor of uncontrollable events. Means and covariances of the seven stress factors were compared between the derivation sample and an age-matched subset of the cross-validation sample. Correlates of the scales with drug use and personality revealed interpretable associations within the cross-validation sample and were quite similar to those in the original sample. Finally, few sex differences were evident, whereas scores on controllable events scales increased with age.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The four symptom items come from the Bentler Medical and Psychological Functioning Inventory depression scale, reported to have strong reliability (.72) in adolescents.
“These items are derived from the Bentler Medical and Psychological Functioning Inventory’s depression scale [26] which exhibits strong reliability (.72) in adolescent samples [27].”
From Social Media Use and Depressive Symptoms Among United States Adolescents (2021) · cites this paper as [27]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Newcomb, M. D., Chou, C.-P., Bentler, P. M., & Huba, G. J. (1988) · Journal of Counseling Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0167.35.4.426 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citationSocial Media Use and Depressive Symptoms Among United States Adolescents
Kreski, N., Platt, J., Rutherford, C., Olfson, M., Odgers, C., Schulenberg, J., & Keyes, K. M. (2021) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2020.07.006 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
- Authors
- NEWCOMB, M. D., HUBA, G. J., & BENTLER, P. M.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- ORCID
- BENTLER, P M
- Venue
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease
- Published
- 1986-05
- Volume
- 174
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 280-289
- ISSN
- 0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2053015276
- Cited by
- 71
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 2 · 2015: 4
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (DA01070)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
- Keywords
- life change events, adolescents, stress, controllable events, uncontrollable events, psychological distress, cross-validation, drug use, personality, age differences, sex differences
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Psychology, Adolescent, Age Factors, Female, Health Status, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Personality, Personality Inventory, Psychometrics, Sex Factors, Stress, Psychological, Substance-Related Disorders
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review