Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 298

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Motivational Interviewing and Treatment Adherence among Psychiatric and Dually Diagnosed Patients

SWANSON, ARTHUR J., PANTALON, MICHAEL V., COHEN, KENNETH R.·1999·The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease

Abstract

The effect of motivational interviewing on outpatient treatment adherence among psychiatric and dually diagnosed inpatients was investigated. Subjects were 121 psychiatric inpatients, 93 (77%) of whom had concomitant substance abuse/dependence disorders, who were randomly assigned to: a) standard treatment (ST), including pharmacotherapy, individual and group psychotherapy, activities therapy, milieu treatment, and discharge planning; or b) ST plus motivational interviewing (ST+MI), which involved 15 minutes of feedback on the results of a motivational assessment early in the hospitalization, and a 1-hour motivational interview just before discharge. Interviewers utilized motivational techniques described in Miller and Rollnick (1991), such as reflective listening, discussion of treatment obstacles, and elicitation of motivational statements. Results indicated that the proportion of patients who attended their first outpatient appointment was significantly higher for the ST+MI group (47%) than for the ST group (21%; chi2 = 8.87, df = 1, p<.01) overall, and for dually diagnosed patients (42% for ST+MI vs. 16% for ST only; chi2 = 7.68, df = 1, p<.01). Therefore, brief motivational interventions show promise in improving outpatient treatment adherence among psychiatric and dually diagnosed patients.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005053-199910000-00007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 12

  1. Axelrod, 1989, Hosp Community Psychiatry, 40, 397
  2. Carey, 1996, Community Ment Health J, 32, 291, 10.1007/BF02249430 · DOI
  3. Chen, 1991, Hosp Community Psychiatry, 42, 282
  4. Daley, 1998, Am J Psychiatry, 155, 1611, 10.1176/ajp.155.11.1611 · DOI
  5. Eisenthal, 1978, Arch Gen Psychiatry, 36, 393, 10.1001/archpsyc.1979.01780040035003 · DOI
  6. Green, 1988, Hosp Community Psychiatry, 39, 963
  7. Haywood, 1995, Am J Psychiatry, 152, 856, 10.1176/ajp.152.6.856 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Heinssen, 1995, Am Psychol, 50, 522, 10.1037/0003-066X.50.7.522 · DOI
  9. Liberman, 1994, Behav Ther, 25, 89, 10.1016/S0005-7894(05)80147-9 · DOI
  10. Sharma, 1995, Health Soc Work, 20, 15, 10.1093/hsw/20.1.15 · DOI
  11. Zeidonis, 1996, Directions Psychiatry, 16, 1
  12. Zeidonis, 1997, Schizophr Bull, 23, 229, 10.1093/schbul/23.2.229 · DOI

Cited by

See all 298

Metadata

Authors
SWANSON, A. J., PANTALON, M. V., & COHEN, K. R.
Venue
The Journal of Nervous & Mental Disease
Published
1999-10
Volume
187
Issue
10
Pages
630-635
ISSN
0022-3018 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2076729007
Cited by
298
References
2
FWCI
6.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.