Cited by 575Behavioral Health and InterventionsPatient-Provider Communication in HealthcareSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Motivational interviewing in health settings: a review

Britt, Eileen, Hudson, Stephen M, Blampied, Neville M·2004·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

There is evidence that patient-centred approaches to health care consultations may have better outcomes than traditional advice giving, especially when lifestyle change is involved. Motivational interviewing (MI) is a patient-centred approach that is gathering increased interest in health settings. It provides a way of working with patients who may not seem ready to make the behaviour changes that are considered necessary by the health practitioner. The current paper provides an overview of MI, with particular reference to its application to health problems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0738-3991(03)00141-1

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • More free-form matrix IA designs might be particularly well-suited to a website or portion of a large website designed to help users resolve their ambiguity about whether or not to engage in a behavior change attempt.

    “For example, the more free-form matrix IA designs might be particularly well-suited to a website (or portion of a large website) designed to help users resolve their ambiguity regarding whether or not to engage in a behavior change attempt [37].”

    From The Information Architecture of Behavior Change Websites (2005) · cites this paper as [37]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 95 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Britt, E., Hudson, S. M., & Blampied, N. M.
Affiliations
University of Canterbury (NZ)
Corresponding author
Britt, Eileen
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2004-05
Volume
53
Issue
2
Pages
147-155
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2102108307
Cited by
575
References
95
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 74 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 36 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 25 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 48 · 2013: 46 · 2012: 33
FWCI
14.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
motivational interviewing, patient-centered care, health consultation, lifestyle modification, behavior change, patient readiness
MeSH terms
Cognitive Dissonance, Communication, Conflict, Psychological, Counseling, Health Promotion, Helping Behavior, Holistic Health, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Life Style, Motivation, Professional-Patient Relations, Psychological Theory, Psychology, Social, Health Behavior, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Patient-Centered Care, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review