The DOI matches its Crossref record.
An overview of the role of cardiovascular reactivity to stressful challenges in the etiology of hypertension
Abstract
There is significant variability among individuals in the cardiovascular responses to both physical and psychologic stimuli, a phenomenon called cardiovascular reactivity. The magnitude of cardiovascular reactivity may distinguish those prone to develop cardiovascular disease or differentiate pathophysiologic states among individuals who have existing pathologies such as hypertension. This article describes the cardiovascular reactivity hypothesis as a proposed mechanism of hypertension development. Furthermore, proposed mechanisms underlying the pathophysiology of hyperreactivity are also discussed. The value of assessing stress-induced cardiovascular reactivity is evaluated with special regard to hypertension, and future avenues for nursing research are presented.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“For example, increases in vascular reactivity have been linked to enhanced peripheral vascular resistance, which is a hemodynamic alteration associated with hypertension (10,13).”
From A high fat meal increases cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress in healthy young adults (2007) · cites this paper as [10]
In the citing paper
“Specifically, the reactivity hypothesis states that exaggerated responses to stress cause a cascade of pathophysiologic events that can eventually lead to sustained increases in blood pressure (1,3,10-12).”
From A high fat meal increases cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress in healthy young adults (2007) · cites this paper as [10]
Citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A high fat meal increases cardiovascular reactivity to psychological stress in healthy young adults
Jakulj, F., Zernicke, K., Bacon, S. L., van Wielingen, L. E., Key, B. L., West, S. G., & Campbell, T. S. (2007) · The Journal of Nutrition · doi:10.1093/jn/137.4.935 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Potempa, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Chicago (US)
- Corresponding author
- Potempa, Kathleen
- ORCID
- Potempa, Kathleen
- Venue
- The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
- Published
- 1994-07
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 27-38
- ISSN
- 0889-4655 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2321085580
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2019: 1 · 2015: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Heart Rate Variability and Autonomic Control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
- Keywords
- cardiovascular reactivity, hypertension etiology, cardiovascular risk, stress physiology, stress measurement
- MeSH terms
- Diagnosis, Differential, Exercise Test, Hemodynamics, Humans, Hypertension, Predictive Value of Tests, Risk Factors, Stress, Physiological, Nursing Research
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review