The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification, Database and Outcomes Committee
Abstract
The purpose of this new classification compendium is to republish the Orthopaedic Trauma Association's (OTA) classification. The OTA classification was originally published in a compendium of the Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma in 1996. It adopted The Comprehensive Classification of the Long Bones developed by Müller and colleagues and classified the remaining bones. In this compendium, the introductory chapter reviews new scientific information about classifying fractures that has been published in the last 11 years. The classification is presented in a revised format that is easier to follow. The OTA and AO classification will now have a unified alpha-numeric code eliminating the differences that have existed between the 2 codes. The code was significantly revised for the clavicle and scapula, foot and hand, and patella. Dislocations have been expanded on an anatomic basis and for most joints will be coded separately. This publication should stimulate new developments and interest in a unified language to code and classify fractures. Further improvements in classification will result in better patient care and clinical research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Design, Materials, and Mechanobiology of Biodegradable Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering
Velasco, M. A., Narváez-Tovar, C. A., & Garzón-Alvarado, D. A. (2015) · BioMed Research International · doi:10.1155/2015/729076 · Cited by 395
Mortality After Distal Femur Fractures in Elderly Patients
Streubel, P. N., Ricci, W. M., Wong, A., & Gardner, M. J. (2011) · Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research · doi:10.1007/s11999-010-1530-2 · Cited by 337
Psychological Factors Predict Disability and Pain Intensity After Skeletal Trauma
Vranceanu, A.-M., Bachoura, A., Weening, A., Vrahas, M., Smith, R. M., & Ring, D. (2014) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.l.00479 · Cited by 315
Locked Plating of Distal Femur Fractures Leads to Inconsistent and Asymmetric Callus Formation
Lujan, T. J., Henderson, C. E., Madey, S. M., Fitzpatrick, D. C., Marsh, J. L., & Bottlang, M. (2010) · Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma · doi:10.1097/bot.0b013e3181be6720 · Cited by 290
Self-citationNyholm, A. M., Gromov, K., Palm, H., Brix, M., Kallemose, T., Troelsen, A., & Collaborators, T. D. F. D. (2015) · Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery · doi:10.2106/jbjs.o.00029 · Cited by 207
Metadata
- Authors
- Marsh, J. L., Slongo, T. F., Agel, J., Broderick, J. S., Creevey, W., DeCoster, T. A., Prokuski, L., Sirkin, M. S., Ziran, B., Henley, B., & Audigé, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma
- Published
- 2007-11
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- S1-S6
- ISSN
- 0890-5339 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2069155192
- Cited by
- 2,370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.54
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification, Database and Outcomes Committee. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001
- The paper
- Marsh, J. L., Slongo, T. F., Agel, J., Broderick, J. S., Creevey, W., DeCoster, T. A., Prokuski, L., Sirkin, M. S., Ziran, B., Henley, B., & Audigé, L. (2007). Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium - 2007: Orthopaedic Trauma Association Classification, Database and Outcomes Committee. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005131-200711101-00001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.