Cited by 32Blood Pressure and Hypertension StudiesSodium Intake and HealthCardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention

Twenty-Four Hour Antihypertensive Efficacy of Indapamide, 1.5-Mg Sustained Release: Results of Two Randomized Double-Blind Controlled Studies

Mallion, Jean-Michel, Asmar, Roland, Boutelant, Sophie, Guez, David·1998·Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology

Abstract

The antihypertensive efficacy of a 1.5-mg sustained-release formulation (SR 1.5) of indapamide, a diuretic related to thiazide, has been pointed out by using conventional sphygmomanometric measurement 24 h after dosing in clinic, in two large European randomized, double-blind, controlled studies (2 and 3 months). One of these studies was then extended to 12 months, as a complementary open study. Quality-controlled ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) data for a total of 216 patients from these studies are presented, including subgroups of hypertensives and responders. Indapamide SR 1.5 achieves an adequate 24-h blood pressure control by significantly reducing the 24-h, diurnal, and nocturnal blood pressures versus baseline, confirming the sphygmomanometric data. The benefit at 2 and 3 months is maintained at 1 year, which confirms the long-term efficacy of SR 1.5 mg. The trough-to-peak ratio--not previously calculated for a diuretic according to international guidelines--meets Food and Drug Administration requirements and confirms the 24-h efficacy of indapamide SR 1.5.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005344-199810000-00023

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Minimum plasma concentration of sustained release indapamide at 1.5 mg/d was similar to 2.5 mg/d conventional formulation.

    “The minimum plasma concentration obtained with the sustained release formulation of indapamide at the dosage of 1.5 mg/d was similar to that obtained with 2.5 mg/d of conventional drug formulation.144”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Mallion, J.-M., Asmar, R., Boutelant, S., & Guez, D.
Affiliations
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble (FR)
Corresponding author
Guez, David
Venue
Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology
Published
1998-10
Volume
32
Issue
4
Pages
673-678
ISSN
0160-2446 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2320651688
Cited by
32
References
28
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Sodium Intake and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention
Keywords
indapamide, sustained-release formulation, hypertension, antihypertensive efficacy, ambulatory blood pressure monitoring, trough-to-peak ratio, thiazide-like diuretics, nocturnal blood pressure, long-term efficacy, blood pressure control
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Circadian Rhythm, Delayed-Action Preparations, Diuretics, Double-Blind Method, Europe, Female, Humans, Hypertension, Indapamide, Male, Middle Aged, Blood Pressure Monitoring, Ambulatory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review