The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Medical Care Solicitation by Criminals with Gunshot Wound Injuries: A Survey of Washington, DC, Jail Detainees
Abstract
Background The best estimates of nonfatal gunshot wounds in the United States come from hospital emergency room data and may miss, among other things, wounded individuals who do not seek medical treatment. Criminals may be those least likely to rely on professional care for their wounds. This study provides evidence of whether medical care is solicited by criminals after gunshot wounds. In addition, the circumstances of the injury events are described. Methods A case series of 79 detainees at a Washington, DC, jail who had previously been shot in 93 separate incidents were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire. Data were obtained concerning the age and race of the victim, the location of the wound, and the length of hospital stay. Results In 92% of the incidents, respondents reported going to the hospital; one-third of those shot were hospitalized for more than 1 week. More than half (54%) had been hit in the head or torso, and 40% had a current disability attributable to the wound. Conclusion Among these "criminals," the vast majority reported that they obtained professional care for their gunshot wounds. Such evidence suggests that individuals previously thought unlikely to enter the medical care system after a firearm injury usually do so. Statistics on medically treated nonfatal gunshot wounds probably do not substantially underestimate the actual number of nonfatal shootings.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
A study from 2000 surveyed 93 incarcerated men and found that 8% of them did not seek medical care for their last firearm injury.
“we did find a study from 2000 that surveyed 93 incarcerated men and found that 8% of them did not seek medical care for their last firearm injury.32”
From Machine learning classification of new firearm injury encounters in the St Louis region: 2010-2020 (2024) · cites this paper as [32]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Annest, 1995, JAMA, 273, 1749, 10.1001/jama.1995.03520460031030 · DOI · Paper page
- Cherry, 1988, Ann Emerg Med, 32, 51, 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70099-X · DOI
- May, 1995, Journal of Health Care for the Poor Underserved, 6, 162, 10.1353/hpu.2010.0640 · DOI
- McLaughlin, 1996, Am J Public Health, 86, 751, 10.2105/AJPH.86.5.751 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Machine learning classification of new firearm injury encounters in the St Louis region: 2010-2020
Ancona, R. M., Cooper, B. P., Foraker, R., Kaser, T., Adeoye, O., & Mueller, K. L. (2024) · Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association · doi:10.1093/jamia/ocae173 · Cited by 7
Metadata
- Authors
- May, J. P., Hemenway, D., Oen, R., & Pitts, K. R.
- Affiliations
- Harvard University (US)
- Venue
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 130
- ISSN
- 0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2091476263
- Cited by
- 9
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
- FWCI
- 0.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Trauma Management and Diagnosis
- Keywords
- gunshot wounds, firearm injuries, health care utilization, jail detainees, offenders, underreporting of injuries, hospitalization, injury circumstances
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Age Factors, Black or African American, Criminal Psychology, District of Columbia, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Population Surveillance, Prisoners, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Wounds, Gunshot, Health Care Surveys
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review