Cited by 9Gun Ownership and Violence ResearchTrauma and Emergency Care StudiesTrauma Management and Diagnosis

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Medical Care Solicitation by Criminals with Gunshot Wound Injuries: A Survey of Washington, DC, Jail Detainees

May, John P., Hemenway, David, Oen, Roger, Pitts, Khalid R.·2000·The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care

Abstract

Background The best estimates of nonfatal gunshot wounds in the United States come from hospital emergency room data and may miss, among other things, wounded individuals who do not seek medical treatment. Criminals may be those least likely to rely on professional care for their wounds. This study provides evidence of whether medical care is solicited by criminals after gunshot wounds. In addition, the circumstances of the injury events are described. Methods A case series of 79 detainees at a Washington, DC, jail who had previously been shot in 93 separate incidents were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire. Data were obtained concerning the age and race of the victim, the location of the wound, and the length of hospital stay. Results In 92% of the incidents, respondents reported going to the hospital; one-third of those shot were hospitalized for more than 1 week. More than half (54%) had been hit in the head or torso, and 40% had a current disability attributable to the wound. Conclusion Among these "criminals," the vast majority reported that they obtained professional care for their gunshot wounds. Such evidence suggests that individuals previously thought unlikely to enter the medical care system after a firearm injury usually do so. Statistics on medically treated nonfatal gunshot wounds probably do not substantially underestimate the actual number of nonfatal shootings.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005373-200001000-00023

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Annest, 1995, JAMA, 273, 1749, 10.1001/jama.1995.03520460031030 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Cherry, 1988, Ann Emerg Med, 32, 51, 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70099-X · DOI
  3. May, 1995, Journal of Health Care for the Poor Underserved, 6, 162, 10.1353/hpu.2010.0640 · DOI
  4. McLaughlin, 1996, Am J Public Health, 86, 751, 10.2105/AJPH.86.5.751 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
May, J. P., Hemenway, D., Oen, R., & Pitts, K. R.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Venue
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Published
2000-01
Volume
48
Issue
1
Pages
130
ISSN
0022-5282 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2091476263
Cited by
9
References
0
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1
FWCI
0.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Gun Ownership and Violence Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Trauma Management and Diagnosis
Keywords
gunshot wounds, firearm injuries, health care utilization, jail detainees, offenders, underreporting of injuries, hospitalization, injury circumstances
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Black or African American, Criminal Psychology, District of Columbia, Persons with Disabilities, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Population Surveillance, Prisoners, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, Time Factors, Wounds, Gunshot, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review