Cited by 83

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Mechanisms and Patterns of Injuries Related to Large Animals

Norwood, Scott, McAuley, Clyde, Vallina, Van L., Fernandez, Luis G., McLarty, Jerry W., Goodfried, Gary·2000·The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care

Abstract

Background Injuries from encounters with large animals represent a significant health risk for rural communities. We evaluated our regional trauma centers' experience with large-animal injuries to determine whether certain mechanisms and patterns of injury predicted either major head/craniofacial or torso (chest/abdomen/pelvis) trauma. Methods The hospital courses of 145 patients with injuries related to large animals were reviewed retrospectively to determine patterns of injury, specific injury mechanisms, species-specific injuries, and predictors of multiple body region trauma. Results Seventy-nine patients (55%) were injured by horses, 47 patients (32%) by bulls, 16 patients (11%) by cows, and 3 patients (2%) by wild animal attacks. The predominant species-specific mechanisms of injury were falls (horses), tramplings (bulls), and kicks (cows). Brain/craniofacial injuries were most common from horse-related encounters (32%), whereas bull and cow encounters usually resulted in torso injuries (45% and 56%, respectively). Multiple body region injuries occurred in 32% of patients. Fractures of the upper extremities were more often associated with torso and head/craniofacial injuries (48%) than lower extremity injuries (17%) (p = 0.02). Conclusion Large animal injuries frequently involve multiple body regions with species-specific mechanisms. Upper extremity injuries are associated with a significantly higher percentage of torso and head/craniofacial injuries, which may have imp…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005373-200004000-00025

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. 1996, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 45, 209
  2. Condie, 1993, Public Health Rep, 108, 121???126
  3. Christey, 1994, J Fam Pract, 39, 148???152
  4. Butterwidk, 1996, Clin J Sport Med, 6, 171???177
  5. Griffin, 1987, Physician Sportsmed, 15, 105???115, 10.1080/00913847.1987.11709284 · DOI
  6. Meyers, 1990, Am J Sports Med, 18, 87???91, 10.1177/036354659001800114 · DOI
  7. Champion, 1990, J Trauma, 30, 1356???1365
  8. Temes, 1997, J Trauma, 43, 492???495, 10.1097/00005373-199709000-00017 · DOI
  9. Bixby-Hammet, 1992, Pediatrics, 89, 1173???1176
  10. Bond, 1995, Pediatrics, 95, 487???489
  11. Hamilton, 1993, J Trauma, 34, 227???231, 10.1097/00005373-199302000-00008 · DOI
  12. Ingemarson, 1989, J Trauma, 29, 25???30, 10.1097/00005373-198901000-00005 · DOI
  13. Bixby-Hammet, 1987, Am Fam Physician GP, 36, 209???214
  14. Whitlock, 1999, Br J Sports Med, 33, 212???216, 10.1136/bjsm.33.3.212 · DOI
  15. Paix, 1999, Br J Sports Med, 33, 46???48, 10.1136/bjsm.33.1.46 · DOI
  16. Langley, 1999, Occup Med, 14, 181???193
  17. Brandenburg, 1998, Ann Emerg Med, 32, 118, 10.1016/S0196-0644(98)70123-4 · DOI
  18. 1996, MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep, 45, 796
  19. Busch, 1986, J Trauma, 26, 559???560, 10.1097/00005373-198606000-00013 · DOI
  20. Grandin, 1999, Occup Med, 14, 195???212

Metadata

Authors
Norwood, S., McAuley, C., Vallina, V. L., Fernandez, L. G., McLarty, J. W., & Goodfried, G.
Venue
The Journal of Trauma: Injury, Infection, and Critical Care
Published
2000-04
Volume
48
Issue
4
Pages
740-744
ISSN
0022-5282
Cited by
83
References
0
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review