The DOI matches its Crossref record.
A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF RECURRENCE RATE AND RISK FACTORS FOR RECURRENCE AFTER A FIRST RENAL STONE
Abstract
PURPOSE: We investigate further the recurrence rate and risk factors for recurrence in 300 consecutive patients who presented to our stone clinic after a first stone episode 7 to 17 years ago. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The medical records of the patients who presented consecutively with a first stone episode from 1980 to 1990 were studied and supplemented by a followup mail questionnaire and telephone interviews. At first visit serum samples were taken from all patients and 24-hour urine samples were collected for metabolic testing. RESULTS: A total of 195 patients were followed successfully, of whom 52 (27%) experienced symptomatic stone recurrence after a mean plus or minus standard deviation of 7.5+/-5.9 years. However, ultrasound examination of 36 symptom-free patients showed recurrent stones in 28%. Comparison of patients with or without recurrence confirmed that recurrence was not influenced by sex, family history of stones and urinary risk factors. However, age at onset of the disease was lower for patients who had 2 or more stones during followup than those who had only 1 stone or no recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: Stones can recur as long as 10 years after the first episode, although the rate is lower than previously reported. The metabolic evaluation after a first stone episode needs to be reappraised in terms of its cost-effectiveness, since recurrences do not seem to be predictable from standard laboratory tests.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Metabolic Evaluation and Recurrence Prevention for Urinary Stone Patients: EAU Guidelines
Skolarikos, A., Straub, M., Knoll, T., Sarica, K., Seitz, C., Petřík, A., & Türk, C. (2015) · European Urology · doi:10.1016/j.eururo.2014.10.029 · Cited by 409
Sequence variants in the CLDN14 gene associate with kidney stones and bone mineral density
Thorleifsson, G., Holm, H., Edvardsson, V., Walters, G. B., Styrkarsdottir, U., Gudbjartsson, D. F., Sulem, P., Halldorsson, B. V., de Vegt, F., d'Ancona, F. C. H., et al. (2009) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.404 · Cited by 309
Gandhi, M., Aggarwal, M., Puri, S., & Singla, S. K. (2013) · International braz j urol · doi:10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2013.01.14 · Cited by 60
Metadata
- Authors
- TRINCHIERI, A., OSTINI, F., NESPOLI, R., ROVERA, F., MONTANARI, E., & ZANETTI, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Urology
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 27-30
- ISSN
- 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
- 1527-3792
- OpenAlex
- W2067437376
- Cited by
- 244
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF RECURRENCE RATE AND RISK FACTORS FOR RECURRENCE AFTER A FIRST RENAL STONE. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005392-199907000-00007
- The paper
- TRINCHIERI, A., OSTINI, F., NESPOLI, R., ROVERA, F., MONTANARI, E., & ZANETTI, G. (1999). A PROSPECTIVE STUDY OF RECURRENCE RATE AND RISK FACTORS FOR RECURRENCE AFTER A FIRST RENAL STONE. Journal of Urology. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005392-199907000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.