Cited by 60Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis TreatmentsCoconut Research and ApplicationsUreteral procedures and complications

Prophylactic effect of coconut water (Cocos nucifera L.) on ethylene glycol induced nephrocalcinosis in male wistar rat

Open access
Gandhi, M., Aggarwal, M., Puri, S., Singla, S.k.·2013·International braz j urol

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: In some occasions, correlations between human structures can help planning surgical intra-abdominal interventions. The previous determination of ureteral length helps pre-operatory planning of surgeries, reduces costs of auxiliary exams, the correct choice of double-J catheter with low morbidity and fewer symptoms, and an adequate adhesion to treatment. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate ureteral length in adult cadavers and to analyze its correlation with anthropometric measures. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April 2009 to January 2012 we determined ureteral length of adult cadavers submitted to necropsy and obtained the following measures: height, distance from shoulder to wrist, elbow-wrist, xiphoid appendix-umbilicus, umbilicus-pubis, xiphoid appendix-pubis and between iliac spines. We analyzed the correlations between ureteral length and those anthropometric measures. RESULTS: We dissected 115 ureters from 115 adult corpses from April 2009 to January 2012. Median ureteral length didn't vary between sexes or according to height. It was observed no correlation among ureteral length and all considered anthropometric measures in all analyzed subgroups and in general population. There were no significant differences between right and left ureteral measures. CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference of ureteral length in relation to height or gender (male or female). There is no significant correlation among ureteral length and the considered anthropometric measures.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1590/s1677-5538.ibju.2013.01.14

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A recent anti-urolithiatic study involving male Wistar rats proved that CW prevented the adherence of crystals on renal tissues and reduced the number of crystals formed in the urine.

    “A recent anti-urolithiatic study involving male Wistar rats proved that CW prevented the adherence of crystals on renal tissues and reduced the number of crystals formed in the urine [38].”

    From Research Progress in Coconut Water: A Review of Nutritional Composition, Biological Activities, and Novel Processing Technologies (2025) · cites this paper as [38]

    The Results report markedly fewer urinary crystals and no crystalline deposits in renal tissue among coconut-water-treated male Wistar rats. The paper did not test crystal adherence as a mechanism, and its discussion acknowledges limitations and describes the findings as suggesting a beneficial effect; “proved” overstates that conclusion. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.84)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Coconut water had prophylactic action against nephrolithiasis in a Wistar rat model.

    “Coconut water had prophylactic action against nephrolithiasis in an experiment with a Wistar rat model (64).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 31 · Cited by 60

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. Stamatelou KK, Francis ME, Jones CA, Nyberg LM, Curhan GC: Time trends in reported prevalence of kidney stones in the United States: 1976-1994. Kidney Int. 2003; 63: 1817-23.
  2. Marickar YM, Joseph D. Abraham PA: Clinical study of 192 urinary stones in Kerala. Ind J Surg. 1977; 39: 144-50.
  3. Buege JA, Aust SD: Microsomal lipid peroxidation. Meth- ods Enzymol. 1978; 52: 302-10.
  4. Luck H: Catalase. In: Bergmeyer HU (ed.), Methods of En- zymatic Analysis. Academic Press, New York 1971; pp. 885-93.

Authors
Gandhi, M., Aggarwal, M., Puri, S., & Singla, S. K.
Affiliations
Panjab University (IN)
Venue
International braz j urol
Published
2013-01
Volume
39
Issue
1
Pages
108-117
ISSN
1677-5538 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2114333753
Cited by
60
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 2
FWCI
2.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc
Locations
  • International braz j urol (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • Americanae (AECID Library) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Indian Council of Medical Research
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Coconut Research and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Ureteral procedures and complications
Keywords
coconut water, Cocos nucifera, nephrocalcinosis, ethylene glycol, ureteral length, anthropometric measures, cadaveric dissection, surgical planning
MeSH terms
Animals, Cocos, Creatinine, Kidney, Male, Phytotherapy, Nephrocalcinosis, Random Allocation, Urea, Water, Treatment Outcome, Rats, Wistar, Ethylene Glycol, Rats, Urolithiasis, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review