The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Eosinophilic Mucin Rhinosinusitis: A Distinct Clinicopathological Entity
Abstract
Background Allergic fungal sinusitis (AFS) was recognized in 1981. Since 1983, a form of sinusitis histologically similar to AFS except for the absence of fungal hyphae has also been noted. The designation “eosinophilic mucin rhinosinusitis (EMRS)” is proposed. Its relationship to AFS is controversial and problematic. Objective To determine whether distinctive clinical and immunological differences exist to differentiate the histological entity of EMRS from AFS. Study Design Literature review and comparison of cases of AFS (n = 418) to EMRS (n = 40) from the literature, as well as cases of AFS (n = 13) and EMRS (n = 29) accrued in the present study. Results A total of 431 AFS patients were compared with 69 EMRS patients. The mean age of patients with AFS was significantly younger than patients with EMRS (30.7 y compared with 48.0 y, respectively;P < .001). Male‐to‐female ratios were 1.03:1 and 1.26:1 for AFS and EMRS, respectively, and were not significantly different. Forty‐one percent of patients with AFS were asthmatic compared with 93% of patients with EMRS (P < .0001). Thirteen percent of patients with AFS were aspirin sensitive compared with 54% of patients with EMRS (P < .0001). Polyp occurrence was almost 100% in both groups. Eighty‐four percent of patients with AFS had allergic rhinitis (AR), while only 63% of patients with EMRS had AR (P = .004). Fifty‐five percent of AFS patients had bilateral disease, in contrast to the 100% of EMRS patients with bilateral disease (P < .0001). Although average total immunoglobulin E (IgE) was elevated in both groups, it was significantly more elevated in AFS patients (range, 12–13,084 mg/dL; mean, 1,941 mg/dL) compared with EMRS patients (range, 14–1,162 mg/dL; mean, 267 mg/dL;P < .001). Total immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgG subclasses were seldom reported in the cases available from the literature of either AFS or EMRS. However, in the present series of EMRS, IgG1 deficiency occurred in 50% of evaluated patients (mean, 475 ± 175 mg/dL; range, 250–869 mg/dL; normal, 422 to 1,200 mg/dL) but in no cases of AFS reported in the literature. Conclusions Significant clinical and immunological differences exist to distinguish AFS from EMRS. It is postulated that AFS is an allergic response to fungi in predisposed individuals, while EMRS occurs because of a systemic dysregulation of immunological controls. Because EMRS is a systemic disease, unilateral disease is not seen. In contrast, AFS, an allergic response to fungi, may occur unilaterally or bilaterally depending on the antigenic stimulation. EMRS also has a significantly higher association with asthma, an increased incidence of aspirin sensitivity, and an increased incidence of IgG1 deficiency. Therapy with a systemic steroid, a potent and indiscriminant anti‐inflammatory agent, is a useful adjunct in both disorders. Fungal immunotherapy following surgical extirpation of AFS is useful in preventing AFS recurrence. It is predicted that fungal immunotherapy and antifungal agents will be ineffective in patients with EMRS. It is important to differentiate these two similar histopathological entities in future trials assessing therapeutic efficacy. Inclusion of both entities in a study could obscure recognition of the true effectiveness of intervention, because of the possible variable response differences between the two entities. This study shows that significant clinical and immunological differences exist between EMRS and AFS. The future awaits an exploration of the pathophysiological basis of these differences.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: rhinosinusitis 2021
Orlandi, R. R., Kingdom, T. T., Smith, T. L., Bleier, B., DeConde, A., Luong, A. U., Poetker, D. M., Soler, Z., Welch, K. C., Wise, S. K., et al. (2021) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.22741 · Cited by 959
International Consensus Statement on Allergy and Rhinology: Rhinosinusitis
Orlandi, R. R., Kingdom, T. T., Hwang, P. H., Smith, T. L., Alt, J. A., Baroody, F. M., Batra, P. S., Bernal‐Sprekelsen, M., Bhattacharyya, N., Chandra, R. K., et al. (2016) · International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology · doi:10.1002/alr.21695 · Cited by 892
Self-citationRhinosinusitis: Establishing definitions for clinical research and patient care
Meltzer, E. O., Hamilos, D. L., Hadley, J. A., Lanza, D. C., Marple, B. F., Nicklas, R. A., Bachert, C., Baraniuk, J., Baroody, F. M., Benninger, M. S., et al. (2004) · Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · doi:10.1016/j.jaci.2004.09.029 · Cited by 854
Self-citationOtolaryngology‐Head and Neck Surgery
Meltzer, E. O., Hamilos, D. L., Hadley, J. A., Lanza, D. C., Marple, B. F., Nicklas, R. A., Bachert, C., Baraniuk, J., Baroody, F. M., Benninger, M. S., et al. (2004) · Otolaryngology–Head and Neck Surgery · doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2004.09.067 · Cited by 559
Self-citationFungal rhinosinusitis: A categorization and definitional schema addressing current controversies
Chakrabarti, A., Denning, D. W., Ferguson, B. J., Ponikau, J., Buzina, W., Kita, H., Marple, B., Panda, N., Vlaminck, S., Kauffmann‐Lacroix, C., et al. (2009) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1002/lary.20520 · Cited by 481
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Ferguson, B. J.
- Venue
- The Laryngoscope
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 110
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 799-813
- ISSN
- 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
- 1531-4995
- OpenAlex
- W2025712618
- Cited by
- 293
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Eosinophilic Mucin Rhinosinusitis: A Distinct Clinicopathological Entity. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005537-200005000-00010
- The paper
- Ferguson, B. J. (2000). Eosinophilic Mucin Rhinosinusitis: A Distinct Clinicopathological Entity. The Laryngoscope. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005537-200005000-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.