Cited by 66Sinusitis and nasal conditionsNasal Surgery and Airway StudiesOtolaryngology and Infectious Diseases

The effects of topical agents of fluticasone propionate, oxymetazoline, and 3% and 0.9% sodium chloride solutions on mucociliary clearance in the therapy of acute bacterial rhinosinusitis in vivo

Open access
Nanl, Selçuk, Öztürk, Özmen, Korkmaz, Mukadder, Tutkun, Alper, Batman, Çağlar·2002·The Laryngoscope

Abstract

Objectives The aims of the study were to determine: 1) how mucociliary activity in acute bacterial rhinosinusitis is affected; 2) how this activity is changed by therapy; 3) the effects of topical agents on mucociliary clearance, and 4) the most appropriate topical agent(s) to be used in the therapy of sinusitis. Study design Five groups of patients with acute bacterial rhinosinusitis were studied prospectively. Methods All patients had 500 mg oral amoxicillin and 125 mg oral clavulanic acid preparations given three times daily for 3 weeks. According to the topical agent applications, these groups included: group I (n = 12), no topical treatment was given; group II (n = 14), two puffs for each nostril once daily of 50 microg/100 mL fluticasone propionate was given; group III (n = 9), one puff for each nostril three times daily of 0.05% oxymetazoline was given; group IV (n =12), 3% sodium chloride (NaCl) (buffered to pH 6.5-7 at room temperature) was given; and group V (n =13), 10-mL solutions of 0.9% NaCl (buffered to pH 6.5--7 at room temperature) were given for nasal irrigations three times daily. All patients had medication for 3 weeks and were controlled each week. The saccharin method was used to measure nasal mucociliary clearance. To investigate the early effects of the topical agents for groups II to V, an additional test was repeated 20 minutes after the basal mucociliary clearance recordings. The test was repeated in the first, second, and third weeks of the treatme…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005537-200202000-00022

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nanl, S., Öztürk, Ö., Korkmaz, M., Tutkun, A., & Batman, Ç.
Affiliations
  • Marmara Üniversitesi Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR)
  • Marmara University (TR)
Corresponding author
Nanl, Selçuk
Venue
The Laryngoscope
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-02
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
320-325
ISSN
  • 0023-852X (ISSN-L)
  • 1531-4995
OpenAlex
W2129329916
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Laryngoscope (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion)
  • Dspace Repository (Marmara Üniversitesi) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Otorhinolaryngology › Sinusitis and nasal conditions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Nasal Surgery and Airway Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Otolaryngology and Infectious Diseases
Keywords
acute bacterial rhinosinusitis, mucociliary clearance, fluticasone propionate, oxymetazoline, nasal irrigation, intranasal corticosteroids, nasal decongestants, amoxicillin-clavulanic acid, treatment efficacy comparison
MeSH terms
Fluticasone, Acute Disease, Administration, Topical, Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Analysis of Variance, Androstadienes, Bacterial Infections, Child, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mucociliary Clearance, Nasal Mucosa, Oxymetazoline, Probability, Prospective Studies, Reference Values, Rhinitis, Sinusitis, Sodium Chloride, Treatment Outcome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review