The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sociobehavioral Determinants of Compliance with Health and Medical Care Recommendations
Abstract
Over the past two decades, hundreds of articles, editorials, and commentaries have been published describing the considerable disruptive effects on quality of care of individuals noncompliance with health and medical advice. While much research has been directed at determining factors responsible for poor compliance, past studies have tended to focus upon easily measured characteristics of the patients, regimen, or illness which, unfortunately, are usually neither predictive nor alterable. This paper systematically reviews the literature on patient acceptance of recommended health behaviors, attempting to find social-psychological and related variables which have proven to be consistent predictors of compliance. The review suggests that certain health beliefs (especailly personal estimates of vulnerability to, and seriousness of, the disease, and faith in the efficacy of care), health-related motivations, perceptions of psychological and other costs of the recommended action, various aspects of the doctor-patient relationship, and social influence are the most productive dimensions for present intervention and further exploration. Building upon an earlier formulation, an hypothesized model is presented which combines these elements for explaining and predicting compliance behavior. Further research should, with standardized questionnaires and analysis techniques, employ prospective, experimental designs for a variety of population groups, settings, and regimens, to evaluate the ability of practical attempts to modify the model variables and thus enhance compliance.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement
Gouldner, A. W. (1960) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092623 · Cited by 12,001
Cited by
Gottfredson, L. S. (2004) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.174 · Cited by 580
Establishing the computer-patient working alliance in automated health behavior change interventions
Bickmore, T., Gruber, A., & Picard, R. (2005) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.09.008 · Cited by 494
HEALTH LOCUS OF CONTROL SCALES
Wallston, K. A., & Wallston, B. S. (1981) · Research with the Locus of Control Construct · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-443201-7.50010-5 · Cited by 499
Predictors of dropout in weight loss interventions: a systematic review of the literature
Moroshko, I., Brennan, L., & O'Brien, P. (2011) · Obesity Reviews · doi:10.1111/j.1467-789x.2011.00915.x · Cited by 497
Turk, D. C., & Rudy, T. E. (1991) · Pain · doi:10.1016/0304-3959(91)90142-k · Cited by 311
Metadata
- Authors
- Becker, M. H., & Maiman, L. A.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 1975-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 10-24
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1966279941
- Cited by
- 1,582
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 17.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sociobehavioral Determinants of Compliance with Health and Medical Care Recommendations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005650-197501000-00002
- The paper
- Becker, M. H., & Maiman, L. A. (1975). Sociobehavioral Determinants of Compliance with Health and Medical Care Recommendations. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-197501000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.