Cited by 580Health disparities and outcomesPublic Health and Social InequalitiesCognitive Abilities and Testing

Intelligence: is it the epidemiologists’ elusive “fundamental cause” of social class inequalities in health?

Gottfredson, Linda S.·2004·Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Abstract

Virtually all indicators of physical health and mental competence favor persons of higher socioeconomic status (SES). Conventional theories in the social sciences assume that the material disadvantages of lower SES are primarily responsible for these inequalities, either directly or by inducing psychosocial harm. These theories cannot explain, however, why the relation between SES and health outcomes (knowledge, behavior, morbidity, and mortality) is not only remarkably general across time, place, disease, and kind of health system but also so finely graded up the entire SES continuum. Epidemiologists have therefore posited, but not yet identified, a more general "fundamental cause" of health inequalities. This article concatenates various bodies of evidence to demonstrate that differences in general intelligence (g) may be that fundamental cause.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/0022-3514.86.1.174

Cites

187 of 187 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As children's intelligence predicts later socio-economic success better than parents' attributes, Glazer and Konrad's finding is consistent with the claim that altruism and IQ are related.

    “As children's intelligence predicts later socio-economic success better than parents' attributes (Gottfredson, 2004), Glazer and Konrads W nding is consistent with our claim that altruism and IQ are related.”

    From Altruistic behavior as a costly signal of general intelligence (2007) · cites this paper as Gottfredson, 2004

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 189 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gottfredson, L. S.
Affiliations
University of Delaware (US)
Corresponding author
Gottfredson, Linda S.
Venue
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Published
2004
Volume
86
Issue
1
Pages
174-199
ISSN
  • 0022-3514 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1315
OpenAlex
W2141185279
Cited by
580
References
189
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 20 · 2021: 34 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 31 · 2018: 39 · 2017: 32 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 30 · 2014: 34 · 2013: 32 · 2012: 21
FWCI
28.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Health › Public Health and Social Inequalities
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
intelligence, socioeconomic status, health disparities, fundamental causes, psychosocial factors, material disadvantage
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Health Status, Humans, Intelligence, Social Class

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review