Cited by 677Chronic Disease Management StrategiesHealthcare Policy and ManagementPrimary Care and Health Outcomes

Development and Application of a Population-Oriented Measure of Ambulatory Care Case-Mix

Weiner, Jonathan P., Starfield, Barbara H., Steinwachs, Donald M., Mumford, Laura M.·1991·Medical Care

Abstract

This article describes a new case-mix methodology applicable primarily to the ambulatory care sector. The Ambulatory Care Group (ACG) system provides a conceptually simple, statistically valid, and clinically relevant measure useful in predicting the utilization of ambulatory health services within a particular population group. ACGs are based on a person's demographic characteristics and their pattern of disease over an extended period of time, such as a year. Specifically, the ACG system is driven by a person's age, sex, and ICD-9-CM diagnoses assigned during patient-provider encounters; it does not require any special data beyond those collected routinely by insurance claims systems or encounter forms. The categorization scheme does not depend on the presence of specific diagnoses that may change over time; rather it is based on broad clusters of diagnoses and conditions. The presence or absence of each disease cluster, along with age and sex, are used to classify a person into one of 51 ACG categories. The ACG system has been developed and tested using computerized encounter and claims data from more than 160,000 continuous enrollees at four large HMOs and a state's Medicaid program. The ACG system can explain more than 50% of the variance in ambulatory resource use if used retrospectively and more than 20% if applied prospectively. This compares with 6% when age and sex alone are used. In addition to describing ACG development and validation, this article also explores some potential applications of the system for provider payment, quality assurance, utilization review, and health services research, particularly as it relates to capitated settings.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005650-199105000-00006

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Weiner, J. P., Starfield, B. H., Steinwachs, D. M., & Mumford, L. M.
Affiliations
Johns Hopkins University (US)
Venue
Medical Care
Published
1991-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
452-472
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2055675683
Cited by
677
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 13 · 2020: 19 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 21 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 26 · 2014: 28 · 2013: 41 · 2012: 34
FWCI
4.81
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (HS05505)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Healthcare Policy and Management
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Primary Care and Health Outcomes
Keywords
case-mix classification, ambulatory care utilization, disease clusters, health maintenance organizations, Medicaid, provider payment, capitation, quality assurance, utilization review
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Ambulatory Care, Child, Child, Preschool, Decision Trees, Demography, Diagnosis-Related Groups, Female, Humans, Infant, Male, Maryland, Middle Aged, Morbidity, Rate Setting and Review, Utilization Review, Models, Statistical, Multivariate Analysis, Cluster Analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review