Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 262

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The Effect of Automated Calls With Telephone Nurse Follow-Up on Patient-Centered Outcomes of Diabetes Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial

Piette, John D., Weinberger, Morris, McPhee, Stephen J.·2000·Medical Care

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated the impact of automated telephone disease management (ATDM) calls with telephone nurse follow-up as a strategy for improving outcomes such as mental health, self-efficacy, satisfaction with care, and health-related quality of life (HRQL) among low-income patients with diabetes mellitus. RESEARCH DESIGN: This was a randomized, controlled trial. SUBJECTS: Two hundred forty-eight primarily English- and Spanish-speaking adults with diabetes enrolled at the time of visits to a county health care system. INTERVENTION: In addition to usual care, intervention patients received biweekly ATDM calls with telephone follow-up by a diabetes nurse educator. Patients used the ATDM calls to report information about their health and self-care and to access self-care education. The nurse used patients' ATDM reports to allocate her time according to their needs. MEASURES: Patient-centered outcomes were measured at 12 months via telephone interview. RESULTS: Compared with patients receiving usual care, intervention patients at follow-up reported fewer symptoms of depression (P = 0.023), greater self-efficacy to conduct self-care activities (P = 0.006), and fewer days in bed because of illness (P = 0.026). Among English-speaking patients, those receiving the intervention reported greater satisfaction with their health care overall and with the technical quality of the services they received, their choice of providers and continuity of care, their communication with providers, and the quality of their health outcomes (all P <0.042). Intervention and control patients had roughly equivalent scores for established measures of anxiety, diabetes-specific HRQL, and general HRQL. CONCLUSIONS: This intervention had several positive effects on patient-centered outcomes of care but no measurable effects on anxiety or HRQL.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005650-200002000-00011

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Cited by

See all 262

Metadata

Authors
Piette, J. D., Weinberger, M., & McPhee, S. J.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2000-02
Volume
38
Issue
2
Pages
218-230
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2041529537
Cited by
262
References
4
FWCI
13.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Effect of Automated Calls With Telephone Nurse Follow-Up on Patient-Centered Outcomes of Diabetes Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005650-200002000-00011
The paper
Piette, J. D., Weinberger, M., & McPhee, S. J. (2000). The Effect of Automated Calls With Telephone Nurse Follow-Up on Patient-Centered Outcomes of Diabetes Care: A Randomized, Controlled Trial. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200002000-00011

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.