Cited by 1,484Chronic Disease Management StrategiesDiabetes Management and EducationNursing care and research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Chronic Disease Self-Management Program: 2-Year Health Status and Health Care Utilization Outcomes

Lorig, Kate R., Ritter, Philip, Stewart, Anita L., Sobel, David S., William Brown, Byron, Bandura, Albert, Gonzalez, Virginia M., Laurent, Diana D., Holman, Halsted R.·2001·Medical Care

Abstract

Objectives To assess the 1- and 2-year health status, health care utilization and self-efficacy outcomes for the Chronic Disease Self-Management Program (CDSMP). The major hypothesis is that during the 2-year period CDSMP participants will experience improvements or less deterioration than expected in health status and reductions in health care utilization. Design Longitudinal design as follow-up to a randomized trial. Setting Community. Participants Eight hundred thirty-one participants 40 years and older with heart disease, lung disease, stroke, or arthritis participated in the CDSMP. At 1- and 2-year intervals respectively 82% and 76% of eligible participants completed data. Main outcome measures Health status (self-rated health, disability, social/role activities limitations, energy/fatigue, and health distress), health care utilization (ER/outpatient visits, times hospitalized, and days in hospital), and perceived self-efficacy were measured. Main results Compared with baseline for each of the 2 years, ER/outpatient visits and health distress were reduced (P Conclusions A low-cost program for promoting health self-management can improve elements of health status while reducing health care costs in populations with diverse chronic diseases.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005650-200111000-00008

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Hoffman, 1996, JAMA, 276, 473, 10.1001/jama.276.18.1473 · DOI
  2. Rothenberg, 1990, Annu Rev Public Health, 11, 267, 10.1146/annurev.pu.11.050190.001411 · DOI
  3. Lorig, 1985, Arthritis Rheum, 28, 680, 10.1002/art.1780280612 · DOI
  4. Ramey, 1992, Arthritis Care Res, 5, 119, 10.1002/art.1790050303 · DOI
  5. Ritter, 2001, J Clin Epidemiol, 54, 136, 10.1016/S0895-4356(00)00261-4 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Lorig, 1993, Arthritis Rheum, 36, 439, 10.1002/art.1780360403 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Vita, 1998, N Engl J Med, 338, 1035, 10.1056/NEJM199804093381506 · DOI
  8. Leveille, 1998, Am Geriatr Soc, 46, 1, 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1998.tb04533.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,484

Metadata

Authors
Lorig, K. R., Ritter, P., Stewart, A. L., Sobel, D. S., William Brown, B., Bandura, A., Gonzalez, V. M., Laurent, D. D., & Holman, H. R.
Affiliations
  • Stanford Medicine (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente Northern California (US)
  • Stanford University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Lorig, Kate R.
  • Ritter, Philip
  • Laurent, Diana D.
  • Holman, Halsted R.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2001-11
Volume
39
Issue
11
Pages
1217-1223
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2038066162
Cited by
1,484
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 31 · 2022: 42 · 2021: 64 · 2020: 63 · 2019: 60 · 2018: 63 · 2017: 81 · 2016: 78 · 2015: 106 · 2014: 81 · 2013: 86 · 2012: 75
FWCI
17.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (5RO1 HS06680)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Chronic Disease Management Strategies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
Keywords
Chronic Disease Self-Management Program, chronic disease self-management, health status, health care utilization, self-efficacy, health distress, disability, activity limitation, fatigue, emergency department visits, hospitalization, older adults, heart disease, lung disease, stroke, arthritis, health promotion
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Chronic Disease, Community Health Services, Cost-Benefit Analysis, Female, Health Status, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Self Care, Matched-Pair Analysis, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Disease Management, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review