Cited by 146Acute Myocardial Infarction ResearchCoronary Interventions and DiagnosticsHealth disparities and outcomes

Impact of Race on Cardiac Care and Outcomes in Veterans With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Petersen, Laura A., Wright, Steven M., Peterson, Eric D., Daley, Jennifer·2002·Medical Care

Abstract

Objectives The goal of this study was to assess racial differences in process of care and outcome for acute myocardial infarction in the VA health care system. Design Retrospective cohort study using clinical data. Setting Eighty-one acute care VA hospitals. Patients Four thousand seven hundred sixty veterans discharged with a confirmed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The analysis was restricted to 606 black and 4005 white patients. Main outcome measures Comparison of use of guideline-based medications, invasive cardiac procedures, and all-cause mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years. Results Black patients were equally likely to receive beta-blockers, more likely than white patients to receive aspirin (86.8% vs. 82.0%; P Conclusions In this integrated health care system, no significant racial disparities in use of noninterventional therapies, diagnostic coronary angiography, or short- or long-term mortality was found. Disparities in use of thrombolytic therapy and coronary artery bypass surgery existed, however, even after accounting for differences in clinical indications for treatment and patient refusals. Further work should assess the role of the medical interaction and physician behavior in racial disparities in use of health care.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005650-200201001-00010

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Petersen, L. A., Wright, S. M., Peterson, E. D., & Daley, J.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
  • Duke Medical Center (US)
  • Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Petersen, Laura A.
Venue
Medical Care
Published
2002-01
Volume
40
Issue
Supplement
Pages
I-86-I-96
ISSN
0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2034104560
Cited by
146
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
8.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
Keywords
racial disparities, acute myocardial infarction, veterans, Veterans Affairs health care, thrombolysis, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary angiography, all-cause mortality, black-white disparities, health care utilization
MeSH terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Aged, Coronary Artery Bypass, Black or African American, Fibrinolytic Agents, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Retrospective Studies, United States, Veterans, Cohort Studies, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Thrombolytic Therapy, Coronary Angiography, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review