Impact of Race on Cardiac Care and Outcomes in Veterans With Acute Myocardial Infarction
Abstract
Objectives The goal of this study was to assess racial differences in process of care and outcome for acute myocardial infarction in the VA health care system. Design Retrospective cohort study using clinical data. Setting Eighty-one acute care VA hospitals. Patients Four thousand seven hundred sixty veterans discharged with a confirmed diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction. The analysis was restricted to 606 black and 4005 white patients. Main outcome measures Comparison of use of guideline-based medications, invasive cardiac procedures, and all-cause mortality at 30 days, 1 year, and 3 years. Results Black patients were equally likely to receive beta-blockers, more likely than white patients to receive aspirin (86.8% vs. 82.0%; P Conclusions In this integrated health care system, no significant racial disparities in use of noninterventional therapies, diagnostic coronary angiography, or short- or long-term mortality was found. Disparities in use of thrombolytic therapy and coronary artery bypass surgery existed, however, even after accounting for differences in clinical indications for treatment and patient refusals. Further work should assess the role of the medical interaction and physician behavior in racial disparities in use of health care.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Black patients were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy and bypass surgery, even when only high-risk coronary anatomic subgroups were assessed.
“Black patients were less likely to receive thrombolytic therapy and bypass surgery, even when only high-risk coronary anatomic subgroups were assessed [2]”
From Unequal treatment: report of the institute of medicine on racial and ethnic disparities in healthcare (2003) · cites this paper as [2]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Green, A. R., Carney, D. R., Pallin, D. J., Ngo, L. H., Raymond, K. L., Iezzoni, L. I., & Banaji, M. R. (2007) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/s11606-007-0258-5 · Cited by 1,460 · see citing works
Is Racism a Fundamental Cause of Inequalities in Health?
Phelan, J. C., & Link, B. G. (2015) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-073014-112305 · Cited by 1,363 · see citing works
Nelson, A. R. (2003) · The Annals of Thoracic Surgery · doi:10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01205-0 · Cited by 166 · see citing works
- Authors
- Petersen, L. A., Wright, S. M., Peterson, E. D., & Daley, J.
- Affiliations
- Baylor College of Medicine (US)
- United States Department of Veterans Affairs (US)
- Duke Medical Center (US)
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Corresponding author
- Petersen, Laura A.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2002-01
- Volume
- 40
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- I-86-I-96
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2034104560
- Cited by
- 146
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 8.95
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Medical Care (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Acute Myocardial Infarction Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
- Keywords
- racial disparities, acute myocardial infarction, veterans, Veterans Affairs health care, thrombolysis, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, coronary angiography, all-cause mortality, black-white disparities, health care utilization
- MeSH terms
- Adrenergic beta-Antagonists, Aged, Coronary Artery Bypass, Black or African American, Fibrinolytic Agents, Health Services Accessibility, Health Services Research, Hospitals, Veterans, Humans, Middle Aged, Myocardial Infarction, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Acceptance of Health Care, Practice Patterns, Physicians', Retrospective Studies, United States, Veterans, Cohort Studies, Angioplasty, Balloon, Coronary, Thrombolytic Therapy, Coronary Angiography, White People
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review