The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Design Strategies and Innovations in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent efforts to provide an annual profile of the health care quality of the nation's health care delivery system and to identify health care disparities in the population's access to and use of health care services have served to stimulate design innovations and content enhancements to the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS). OBJECTIVES: To present a summary of the analytical objectives, design, and core content of the MEPS, and to provide an overview of the new and innovative design features that add capacity for health status and quality of care measurement and improve data quality. SUMMARY: The MEPS questionnaire has been expanded to include content taken from the Consumer Assessment of Health Plans Study (CAHPS) to facilitate assessments of patient experiences with health care at the national level. The survey now includes the series of questions from the SF-12 and the EuroQol 5D to improve the survey's capacity to measure health status. Additional condition-specific questions for diabetes, asthma, high blood pressure, and heart disease were added to identify the health care services received for treatment and to determine whether the care received was consistent with practice guidelines. Sample design modifications are presented, with particular emphasis given to a summary of the recent sample size increase and resultant improvements in the precision of resultant survey estimates. Attention is also given to changes in survey design, estimation, and data collection strategies that improve data quality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
WARE, J. E., KOSINSKI, M., & KELLER, S. D. (1996) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199603000-00003 · Cited by 17,392
Cited by
Expenditures and health status among adults with back and neck problems
Martin, B. I. (2008) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.299.6.656 · Cited by 1,531
The impact of obesity on health-related quality-of-life in the general adult US population
Jia, H., & Lubetkin, E. I. (2005) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1093/pubmed/fdi025 · Cited by 559
Luo, N., Johnson, J. A., Shaw, J. W., Feeny, D., & Coons, S. J. (2005) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/01.mlr.0000182493.57090.c1 · Cited by 383
Cohen, J. W., Cohen, S. B., & Banthin, J. S. (2009) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181a23e3a · Cited by 342
Self-citationMahmoudi, E., & Meade, M. A. (2015) · Disability and Health Journal · doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2014.08.007 · Cited by 134
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, S. B.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2003-07
- Volume
- 41
- Issue
- Supplement
- Pages
- III-5–III–12
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1999382645
- Cited by
- 172
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 33.41
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Design Strategies and Innovations in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005650-200307007-00002
- The paper
- Cohen, S. B. (2003). Design Strategies and Innovations in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005650-200307007-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.