The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: A National Information Resource to Support Healthcare Cost Research and Inform Policy and Practice
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey (MEPS) collects detailed information regarding the use and payment for health care services from a nationally representative sample of Americans. The survey is designed to provide analysts with the data they need to support policy-relevant research on health care expenses, utilization, insurance coverage, and access in the United States and to provide policymakers with the results and data they need to make informed decisions. OBJECTIVES: This article summarizes the capacity of this broad-based and publicly available information resource to support research efforts directed towards achieving a better understanding of the dynamics of American healthcare and to better characterize its current state. METHODS: The MEPS comprises a nationally representative sample of the civilian noninstitutionalized population in the United States, and collects comprehensive data on individuals and their health care experiences over a span of 2 years. Household survey data are collected by means of computer-assisted personal interviews, and those data are supplemented by information collected directly from the medical providers used by survey participants. Insurance data are collected both from households and through a separate state and nationally representative survey of business establishments, which collects information on health insurance provided by United States employers. RESULTS: The MEPS has been used extensively in scientific publications and published reports, as well as by the Federal and state governments to examine the delivery and financing of healthcare in the United States. CONCLUSIONS: The analytical findings generated by the MEPS are key inputs to facilitate the development, implementation, and evaluation of policies and practices addressing health care in the United States and its related costs. Recent efforts to reconcile MEPS and the National Health Expenditure Accounts have the potential to provide an even more accurate and powerful data tool for research and policy analysis.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Bloom, B. S. (2002) · JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association · doi:10.1001/jama.287.5.646-a · Cited by 3,726
To Err is Human: Building a Safer Health System in 1999.
Stefl, M. E. (2001) · PubMed · Cited by 1,738
Finkelstein, E. A., Fiebelkorn, I. C., & Wang, G. (2003) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w3.219 · Cited by 1,135
The Growing Burden of Chronic Disease in America
Anderson, G., & Horvath, J. (2004) · Public Health Reports® · doi:10.1016/j.phr.2004.04.005 · Cited by 494
Care without Coverage: Too Little, Too Late
Kilbourne, A. M. (2005) · PubMed Central · Cited by 461
Thorpe, K. E., Florence, C. S., Howard, D. H., & Joski, P. (2004) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.w4.480 · Cited by 436
The Concentration Of Health Care Expenditures, Revisited
Berk, M. L., & Monheit, A. C. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.2.9 · Cited by 369
Banthin, J. S., & Bernard, D. M. (2006) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.296.22.2712 · Cited by 201
Self-citationDesign Strategies and Innovations in the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey
Cohen, S. B. (2003) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-200307007-00002 · Cited by 172
Self-citationNational Health Spending In 2006: A Year Of Change For Prescription Drugs
Catlin, A., Cowan, C., Hartman, M., & Heffler, S. (2008) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.27.1.14 · Cited by 167
Cited by
Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics—2011 Update: A Report From the American Heart Association
Roger, V. L., Go, A. S., Lloyd-Jones, D. M., Adams, R. J., Berry, J. D., Brown, T. M., Carnethon, M. R., Dai, S., de Simone, G., Ford, E. S., et al. (2011) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0b013e3182009701 · Cited by 6,149
Hay, R. J., Johns, N. E., Williams, H. C., Bolliger, I. W., Dellavalle, R. P., Margolis, D. J., Marks, R., Naldi, L., Weinstock, M. A., Wulf, S. K., et al. (2014) · Journal of Investigative Dermatology · doi:10.1038/jid.2013.446 · Cited by 1,706
Fenton, J. J. (2012) · Archives of Internal Medicine · doi:10.1001/archinternmed.2011.1662 · Cited by 911
Ovbiagele, B., Goldstein, L. B., Higashida, R. T., Howard, V. J., Johnston, S. C., Khavjou, O. A., Lackland, D. T., Lichtman, J. H., Mohl, S., Sacco, R. L., et al. (2013) · Stroke · doi:10.1161/str.0b013e31829734f2 · Cited by 834
Defining and Measuring Chronic Conditions: Imperatives for Research, Policy, Program, and Practice
Goodman, R. A., Posner, S. F., Huang, E. S., Parekh, A. K., & Koh, H. K. (2013) · Preventing Chronic Disease · doi:10.5888/pcd10.120239 · Cited by 807
Metadata
- Authors
- Cohen, J. W., Cohen, S. B., & Banthin, J. S.
- Venue
- Medical Care
- Published
- 2009-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 7_Supplement_1
- Pages
- S44-S50
- ISSN
- 0025-7079 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2027295120
- Cited by
- 342
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 31.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: A National Information Resource to Support Healthcare Cost Research and Inform Policy and Practice. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181a23e3a
- The paper
- Cohen, J. W., Cohen, S. B., & Banthin, J. S. (2009). The Medical Expenditure Panel Survey: A National Information Resource to Support Healthcare Cost Research and Inform Policy and Practice. Medical Care. https://doi.org/10.1097/mlr.0b013e3181a23e3a
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.