Cited by 693Cardiovascular and exercise physiologySports Performance and TrainingMuscle metabolism and nutrition

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of moderate-intensity endurance and high-intensity intermittent training on anaerobic capacity and VO2max

TABATA, IZUMI, NISHIMURA, KOUJI, KOUZAKI, MOTOKI, HIRAI, YUUSUKE, OGITA, FUTOSHI, MIYACHI, MOTOHIKO, YAMAMOTO, KAORU·1996·Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise

Abstract

This study consists of two training experiments using a mechanically braked cycle ergometer. First, the effect of 6 wk of moderate-intensity endurance training (intensity: 70% of maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max), 60 min.d-1, 5 d.wk-1) on the anaerobic capacity (the maximal accumulated oxygen deficit) and VO2max was evaluated. After the training, the anaerobic capacity did not increase significantly (P > 0.10), while VO2max increased from 53 +/- 5 ml.kg-1 min-1 to 58 +/- 3 ml.kg-1.min-1 (P < 0.01) (mean +/- SD). Second, to quantify the effect of high-intensity intermittent training on energy release, seven subjects performed an intermittent training exercise 5 d.wk-1 for 6 wk. The exhaustive intermittent training consisted of seven to eight sets of 20-s exercise at an intensity of about 170% of VO2max with a 10-s rest between each bout. After the training period, VO2max increased by 7 ml.kg-1.min-1, while the anaerobic capacity increased by 28%. In conclusion, this study showed that moderate-intensity aerobic training that improves the maximal aerobic power does not change anaerobic capacity and that adequate high-intensity intermittent training may improve both anaerobic and aerobic energy supplying systems significantly, probably through imposing intensive stimuli on both systems.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005768-199610000-00018

Cites

8 of 8 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 8 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Medbo, 1990, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 22, 501

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 693

Metadata

Authors
TABATA, I., NISHIMURA, K., KOUZAKI, M., HIRAI, Y., OGITA, F., MIYACHI, M., & YAMAMOTO, K.
Affiliations
National Institute of Fitness and Sports in Kanoya (JP)
Venue
Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
Published
1996-10
Volume
28
Issue
10
Pages
1327-1330
ISSN
0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063036083
Cited by
693
References
8
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 36 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 40 · 2022: 50 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 46 · 2018: 52 · 2017: 49 · 2016: 42 · 2015: 35 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 14
FWCI
9.35
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports Performance and Training
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Muscle metabolism and nutrition
Keywords
high-intensity intermittent training, anaerobic capacity, VO2max, accumulated oxygen deficit, cycle ergometer training
MeSH terms
Adult, Humans, Male, Oxygen Consumption, Physical Education and Training, Physical Endurance, Anaerobic Threshold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review