The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Validation of an instrument for measurement of physical activity in youth
Abstract
This study assessed the reliability and validity of the Previous Day Physical Activity Recall (PDPAR), a self-report instrument designed to measure physical activity in youth. Subjects were randomly selected students in grades 7-12. Test-retest reliability was reported as the correlation between estimated relative energy expenditures determined from two PDPAR administrations completed within 1 h. Interrater reliability was determined by two observers using the scoring protocol. Validity was assessed using footstrikes (pedometer), Caltrac activity counts, and heart rate monitoring as criterion measures. Interrater and test-retest reliability was 0.99 and 0.98, respectively (P < 0.01). The correlation between relative energy expenditure from the PDPAR (kcal.kg-1.l.d-1) and pedometer and Caltrac counts was 0.88 (P < 0.01) and 0.77 (P < 0.01), respectively. The correlation between percentage heart rate range (HRmax-HR-rest) and mean energy expenditure from the PDPAR was 0.53 (P < 0.01). The correlation between 1-min heart rates > 50% HRR sustained for 20 min and the number of 30-min blocks with a relative energy expenditure of at least four metabolic equivalent tasks (MET) was 0.63 (P < 0.01). The PDPAR provides valid and reliable estimates of physical activity and also accurately identifies bouts of moderate to vigorous activity.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Pate, R. R. (1995) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1995.03520290054029 · Cited by 4,606
Self-citationCompendium of Physical Activities: Classification of energy costs of human physical activities
AINSWORTH, B. E., HASKELL, W. L., LEON, A. S., JACOBS, D. R., MONTOYE, H. J., SALLIS, J. F., & PAFFENBARGER, R. S. (1993) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/00005768-199301000-00011 · Cited by 4,102
Cited by
Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions
Sallis, J. F., & Saelens, B. E. (2000) · Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport · doi:10.1080/02701367.2000.11082780 · Cited by 2,351
Brener, N. D., Billy, J. O. G., & Grady, W. R. (2003) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(03)00052-1 · Cited by 1,331
Reliability of the 1999 youth risk behavior survey questionnaire
BRENER, N., KANN, L., MCMANUS, T., KINCHEN, S., SUNDBERG, E., & ROSS, J. (2002) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/s1054-139x(02)00339-7 · Cited by 1,101
A Randomized Trial of Sugar-Sweetened Beverages and Adolescent Body Weight
Ebbeling, C. B., Feldman, H. A., Chomitz, V. R., Antonelli, T. A., Gortmaker, S. L., Osganian, S. K., & Ludwig, D. S. (2012) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1203388 · Cited by 699
Practical Guide to Measuring Physical Activity
Sylvia, L. G., Bernstein, E. E., Hubbard, J. L., Keating, L., & Anderson, E. J. (2014) · Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics · doi:10.1016/j.jand.2013.09.018 · Cited by 637
Metadata
- Authors
- WESTON, A. T., PETOSA, R., & PATE, R. R.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1997-01
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 138-143
- ISSN
- 0195-9131 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2056934962
- Cited by
- 386
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 3.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.