Cited by 2,351Physical Activity and HealthCardiovascular and exercise physiologyContext-Aware Activity Recognition Systems

Assessment of physical activity by self-report: Status, limitations, and future directions

Sallis, James F., Saelens, Brian E.·2000·Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/02701367.2000.11082780

Cites

52 of 52 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sallis, J. F., & Saelens, B. E.
Venue
Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport
Published
2000-06
Volume
71
Issue
sup2
Pages
1-14
ISSN
  • 0034-5377 (ISSN-L)
  • 0270-1367
  • 2168-3824
OpenAlex
W2091631842
Cited by
2,351
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 52 · 2025: 64 · 2024: 90 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 94 · 2021: 151 · 2020: 158 · 2019: 142 · 2018: 123 · 2017: 113 · 2016: 125 · 2015: 88 · 2014: 102 · 2013: 118 · 2012: 115
FWCI
13.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Context-Aware Activity Recognition Systems
Keywords
physical activity measurement, self-report questionnaire, validity, reliability statistics
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Physical Fitness, Quality Control, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self-Evaluation Programs, Sensitivity and Specificity, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review