The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Applicability of ??VO2max criteria: discontinuous versus continuous protocols
Abstract
This study compared the classic discontinuous Taylor et al. (1955) protocol to a continuous version of the same protocol to evaluate maximal physiological responses, and the quantitative values and incidence of achievement of the various maximal oxygen uptake (VO2max) criteria in 10 males (24.1 +/- 2.5 yr). Criteria were a plateau in VO2 (change or = 1.15, and lactate > 8 mmol.l-1. Values for VO2max (56.8 +/- 4.7 vs 55.8 +/- 4.2 ml.kg-1.min-1), ventilation (150.7 +/- 16 vs 149.5 +/- 17.5 l.min-1 BTPS), and HR (186.3 +/- 7.7 beats.min-1 vs 191.7 +/- 6.7 beats.min-1) were similar (P < 0.05) between the discontinuous protocol (DT) and the continuous protocol (CT), respectively. Values for RER (1.28 +/- 0.05 vs 1.22 +/- 0.05) and lactate (14.3 +/- 2.7 vs 11.9 +/- 2.7 mmol.l-1) were greater (P < 0.05) on the DT than the CT. Criteria achievement were the following: 40% (CT) and 10% (DT) for HR; 50% (CT) and 60% (DT) for a VO2 plateau; and, 90% (CT) and 100% (DT) for RER and lactate. It is concluded that a VO2 plateau is not a prerequisite for defining VO2max and is of limited use as the primary objective criterion for evaluating the quality of a graded exercise test. Therefore, the achievement of secondary objective criteria, specifically RER and lactate in combination, increases the likelihood that the highest VO2 value achieved is VO2max.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“While several methods exist to estimate V O 2max in the field (5, 25), directly measuring maximal oxygen uptake remains the gold standard (12).”
From Comparison of a Continuous and Discontinuous GXT on VO2 in Resistance-Trained and Endurance-Trained Males (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“These results confirm the myriad of research indicating that utilization of a discontinuous protocol to assess V O 2max does not provide any additional testing validity (12, 24, 26, 27).”
From Comparison of a Continuous and Discontinuous GXT on VO2 in Resistance-Trained and Endurance-Trained Males (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
In the citing paper
“Multiple studies have found there to be no differences in V O 2peak when comparing a discontinuous GXT protocol to a continuous protocol (12, 24, 26, 27).”
From Comparison of a Continuous and Discontinuous GXT on VO2 in Resistance-Trained and Endurance-Trained Males (2022) · cites this paper as [12]
Citations
Cites
A comparative analysis of four protocols for maximal treadmill stress testing
Pollock, M. L., Bohannon, R. L., Cooper, K. H., Ayres, J. J., Ward, A., White, S. R., & Linnerud, A. C. (1976) · American Heart Journal · doi:10.1016/s0002-8703(76)80401-2 · Cited by 536
Research works printed but not linked: 17
- Cumming, 1972, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 4, 18
- Froelicher, 1974, J Appl Physiol, 36, 720, 10.1152/jappl.1974.36.6.720 · DOI
- Glassford, 1965, J Appl Physiol, 20, 509, 10.1152/jappl.1965.20.3.509 · DOI
- Howley, 1995, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 27, 1292, 10.1249/00005768-199509000-00009 · DOI · Paper page
- Issekutz, 1962, J Appl Physiol, 17, 47, 10.1152/jappl.1962.17.1.47 · DOI
- Issekutz, 1961, J Appl Physiol, 16, 606, 10.1152/jappl.1961.16.4.606 · DOI
- Kasch, 1976, J Appl Physiol, 40, 982, 10.1152/jappl.1976.40.6.982 · DOI
- Maksud, 1971, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 3, 63
- Maritz, 1961, Ergonomics, 4, 97, 10.1080/00140136108930512 · DOI
- McArdle, 1973, Sci Sports Exerc, 5, 156
- McConnell, 1988, Sports Med, 5, 57, 10.2165/00007256-198805010-00005 · DOI
- Noakes, 1988, Med Sci Sports Exerc, 20, 319, 10.1249/00005768-198808000-00001 · DOI
- Pollock, 1980, Comp Ther, 6, 12
- Scholander, 1947, J Biol Chem, 167, 235, 10.1016/S0021-9258(17)35161-X · DOI
- Shephard, 1984, Sports Med, 1, 99, 10.2165/00007256-198401020-00002 · DOI
- Taylor, 1955, J Appl Physiol, 8, 73, 10.1152/jappl.1955.8.1.73 · DOI
- Taylor, 1963, Pediatrics, 32, 703, 10.1542/peds.32.4.703 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Limiting factors for maximum oxygen uptake and determinants of endurance performance
BASSETT, D. R. (2000) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-200001000-00012 · Cited by 2,410
Recommendations for improved data processing from expired gas analysis indirect calorimetry
Robergs, R. A., Dwyer, D., & Astorino, T. (2010) · Sports Medicine · doi:10.2165/11319670-000000000-00000 · Cited by 356
Is determination of exercise intensities as percentages of &OV0312;O2max or HRmax adequate?
MEYER, T., GABRIEL, H. H. W., & KINDERMANN, W. (1999) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1097/00005768-199909000-00017 · Cited by 183
Supramaximal Testing to Confirm Attainment of VO2max in Sedentary Men and Women
Astorino, T., White, A., & Dalleck, L. (2009) · International Journal of Sports Medicine · doi:10.1055/s-0028-1104588 · Cited by 85
(2022) · International Journal of Exercise Science · doi:10.70252/nhay2400 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- DUNCAN, G. E., HOWLEY, E. T., & JOHNSON, B. N.
- Venue
- Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise
- Published
- 1997-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 273-278
- ISSN
- 0195-9131
- Cited by
- 153
- References
- 1
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Applicability of ??VO2max criteria: discontinuous versus continuous protocols. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005768-199702000-00017
- The paper
- DUNCAN, G. E., HOWLEY, E. T., & JOHNSON, B. N. (1997). Applicability of ??VO2max criteria: discontinuous versus continuous protocols. Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005768-199702000-00017