Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 345

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Whipple Disease: Clinical Review of 52 Cases

Durand, Denis Vital, Lecomte, Claire, Cathébras, Pascal, Rousset, Hugues, Godeau, Pierre·1997·Medicine

Abstract

Whipple disease is a rare, multiorgan disease with prominent intestinal manifestations. We report a retrospective clinical study of 52 patients recruited in various parts of France from 1967 to 1994. Seventy-three percent of the patients were male. Clinical manifestations preceding the diagnosis were articular for 35 patients (67%), digestive for 8 patients (15%), general for 7 patients (14%), and neurologic for 2 patients (4%). At a later stage of the disease, 44 patients (85%) presented diarrhea, weight loss, and malabsorption, while 8 patients (15%) did not show any gastrointestinal symptom throughout the development of the disease. Forty-three patients (83%) presented arthralgia or arthritis, and 11 (21%) had prominent neurologic symptoms. In addition, cardiovascular symptoms were present in 9 patients (17%); mucocutaneous symptoms, in 9 patients (17%); pleuropulmonary symptoms, in 7 patients (13%); and ophthalmologic symptoms, in 5 patients (10%). All patients but 1 were given a positive diagnosis on histopathologic criteria: jejunal biopsy for 46 patients (90%), lymph node biopsy for 3 patients (6%), brain biopsy for 1 patient (2%), postmortem jejunal and cerebral biopsy for 1 patient (2%). With treatment, the disease evolved favorably in 47 patients (90%), while 5 patients (10%) had unfavorable outcomes (2 deaths from neurologic involvement, 1 patient with chronic dementia, and 2 patients with digestive symptoms insensitive to antimicrobial therapy). Of the 41 patients initially treated successfully and whose treatment has been completed, clinical evolution after discontinuation of treatment was favorable in 34 cases (83%). Clinical relapses occurred in 7 patients. No relapse was observed after treatment by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, alone or following a combination of penicillin and streptomycin, or after the combination of penicillin and streptomycin, whatever the oral follow-up treatment prescribed. The evolution of patients showing a relapse was favorable in all cases after reintroduction of antibiotic therapy. These results are discussed in the light of previously published series and case reports of Whipple disease. The diagnosis of the disease remains difficult at an early phase or when digestive symptoms are absent. It is noteworthy that proximal enteroscopy is sometimes misleading, considered normal on macroscopic examination and nonspecific on pathologic grounds. A normal erythrocyte sedimentation rate represents another pitfall. Histopathology is the key for positive and differential diagnosis, and may require multiple and repeated biopsies. Findings from molecular biology confirm the central role of an uncultured Gram-positive bacillus which was named in 1992 Tropheryma whippelii. A recent report suggests that polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis of peripheral blood might allow the diagnosis of Whipple disease in some cases. However, immunologic or cellular parameters such as macrophagic function may play an important, although not clearly elucidated, role in the pathogeny of the disease. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole should be considered the antimicrobial agent of choice in the treatment of Whipple disease, minimizing the risk of cerebral involvement and relapses.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00005792-199705000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 345

Metadata

Authors
Durand, D. V., Lecomte, C., Cathébras, P., Rousset, H., & Godeau, P.
Venue
Medicine
Published
1997-05
Volume
76
Issue
3
Pages
170-184
ISSN
0025-7974 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2403868246
Cited by
345
References
0
FWCI
7.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whipple Disease: Clinical Review of 52 Cases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00005792-199705000-00003
The paper
Durand, D. V., Lecomte, C., Cathébras, P., Rousset, H., & Godeau, P. (1997). Whipple Disease: Clinical Review of 52 Cases. Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005792-199705000-00003

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.