Cited by 325Acute Ischemic Stroke ManagementNeurological Disease Mechanisms and TreatmentsCerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases

Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusion in Rats

Menzies, Stephen A., Hoff, Julian T., Betz, A. Lorris·1992·Neurosurgery

Abstract

Middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) in rats produces an infarct of varying size. We examined three factors that may influence this variability: animal weight, vascular anatomy, and extent of occlusion in rats undergoing MCAO. We also developed a four-point neurological evaluation scale and validated its usefulness by comparing it with a four-grade pathological determination of the size of the infarct. Of 82 animals subjected to a standard MCAO, 34 developed small cortical infarcts (pathological grades I-II; infarct size less than 25 mm2, 6-17% of the ipsilateral cortex surface area), and 48 large infarcts (pathological grades III-IV, infarct size greater than 25 mm2, 20-56% of surface area). We were able to predict the size of infarction from the neurological evaluation in 83% of the animals, and this accuracy reached 91% when grades I and II and III and IV were considered together (P less than 0.001). In 41 animals subjected to a more extensive vascular occlusion, 89% exhibited large infarcts. Four vascular patterns were identified but none played a significant role in the incidence or size of the cortical stroke. However, rats weighing less than 300 g showed a smaller lesion size than did rats greater than 300 g. Our proposed new MCAO technique appears useful in reproducing large-sized infarcts of the frontoparietal cortex.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006123-199207000-00014

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In mice and rats, a Menzies score of at least 2 points was observed during the 24-h observation period, indicating sufficient cerebral ischemia as inclusion criteria.

    “In mice and rats, a Menzies score of at least 2 points was observed during the 24-h observation period, indicating sufficient cerebral ischemia as inclusion criteria for entering the study.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Menzies, S. A., Hoff, J. T., & Betz, A. L.
Affiliations
University of Michigan (US)
Venue
Neurosurgery
Published
1992-07-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
100-107
ISSN
  • 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
  • 1524-4040
OpenAlex
W1989855642
Cited by
325
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 19 · 2012: 14
FWCI
2.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurosurgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5r01ns023870-12)
  • National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NS-17760, NS23870, R01NS017760)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Acute Ischemic Stroke Management
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Neurological Disease Mechanisms and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Keywords
middle cerebral artery occlusion, cerebral infarction, animal weight, vascular anatomy, Neurological Evaluation Scale, cortical stroke, animal models of stroke
MeSH terms
Animals, Behavior, Animal, Brain, Brain Mapping, Cerebral Arteries, Cerebral Cortex, Cerebral Infarction, Brain Ischemia, Collateral Circulation, Disease Models, Animal, Dominance, Cerebral, Male, Motor Skills, Neurologic Examination, Rats, Inbred Strains, Regional Blood Flow, Stereotyped Behavior, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review