The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Long-term Outcomes for Surgically Resected Craniopharyngiomas
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study critically analyzed the long-term functional outcomes and tumor recurrence rates for surgically treated craniopharyngiomas. METHODS: This study used an outcome classification system that included functioning vision, independent versus dependent living, Karnofsky Performance Scale scores, academic levels, work status, and psychological status. Tumor recurrence rates were analyzed with respect to the extent of surgical resection and adjunctive radiotherapy. RESULTS: For 121 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 10 years, the overall "good outcome" rate was 60.3%. Factors associated with poor outcomes included lethargy at presentation, visual deterioration, papilledema, tumor calcification, hydrocephalus, and tumor adhesiveness at surgery. Gross total resection was associated with good outcomes (P = 0.017) and decreased risk of recurrence (P = 0.024). Subtotal resection was associated with increased risk of tumor recurrence (P = 0.0235). The highest risk of recurrence was in the subtotal resection/no radiation group (P = 0.0001). There were no differences in outcomes or recurrence rates between pediatric and adult patients. There were also no differences in outcomes or recurrence rates between papillary and adamantinous tumors. Approximately one-third of patients exhibited morbid obesity, and permanent diabetes insipidus was observed for 25 patients. CONCLUSION: A rigorous evaluation of outcomes for tumors such as craniopharyngiomas must consider not only the extent of resection, as judged by postoperative imaging, but also the long-term physical, intellectual, and psychological functioning of the patients.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Craniopharyngiomas in children and adults: systematic analysis of 121 cases with long-term follow-up
Karavitaki, N., Brufani, C., Warner, J. T., Adams, C. B. T., Richards, P., Ansorge, O., Shine, B., Turner, H. E., & Wass, J. A. H. (2005) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02231.x · Cited by 633
Karavitaki, N., Cudlip, S., Adams, C. B. T., & Wass, J. A. H. (2006) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2006-0002 · Cited by 514
Mortality in Patients with Pituitary Disease
Sherlock, M., Ayuk, J., Tomlinson, J. W., Toogood, A. A., Aragon-Alonso, A., Sheppard, M. C., Bates, A. S., & Stewart, P. M. (2010) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2009-0033 · Cited by 392
Predictors of diabetes insipidus after transsphenoidal surgery: A review of 881 patients
Nemergut, E. C., Zuo, Z., Jane, J. A., & Laws, E. R. (2005) · Journal of neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2005.103.3.0448 · Cited by 313
Cavallo, L. M., Frank, G., Cappabianca, P., Solari, D., Mazzatenta, D., Villa, A., Zoli, M., D'Enza, A. I., Esposito, F., & Pasquini, E. (2014) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/2014.3.jns131521 · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Duff, J. M., Meyer, F. B., Ilstrup, D. M., Laws, E. R., Schleck, C. D., & Scheithauer, B. W.
- Venue
- Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 291-305
- ISSN
- 0148-396X (ISSN-L)
- 1524-4040
- OpenAlex
- W1988890429
- Cited by
- 356
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long-term Outcomes for Surgically Resected Craniopharyngiomas. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006123-200002000-00007
- The paper
- Duff, J. M., Meyer, F. B., Ilstrup, D. M., Laws, E. R., Schleck, C. D., & Scheithauer, B. W. (2000). Long-term Outcomes for Surgically Resected Craniopharyngiomas. Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006123-200002000-00007
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.