The DOI matches its Crossref record; 39 of the 39 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients: Clinical article
Abstract
Object: Despite their benign histological appearance, craniopharyngiomas can be considered a challenge for the neurosurgeon and a possible source of poor prognosis for the patient. With the widespread use of the endoscope in endonasal surgery, this route has been proposed over the past decade as an alternative technique for the removal of craniopharyngiomas. Methods: The authors retrospectively analyzed data from a series of 103 patients who underwent the endoscopic endonasal approach at two institutions (Division of Neurosurgery of the Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II, Naples, Italy, and Division of Neurosurgery of the Bellaria Hospital, Bologna, Italy), between January 1997 and December 2012, for the removal of infra- and/or supradiaphragmatic craniopharyngiomas. Twenty-nine patients (28.2%) had previously been surgically treated. Results: The authors achieved overall gross-total removal in 68.9% of the cases: 78.9% in purely infradiaphragmatic lesions and 66.3% in lesions involving the supradiaphragmatic space. Among lesions previously treated surgically, the gross-total removal rate was 62.1%. The overall improvement rate in visual disturbances was 74.7%, whereas worsening occurred in 2.5%. No new postoperative defect was noted. Worsening of the anterior pituitary function was reported in 46.2% of patients overall, and there were 38 new cases (48.1% of 79) of postoperative diabetes insipidus. The most common complication was postoperative CSF leakage; the overall rate was 14.6%, and it diminished to 4% in the last 25 procedures, thanks to improvement in reconstruction techniques. The mortality rate was 1.9%, with a mean follow-up duration of 48 months (range 3–246 months). Conclusions: The endoscopic endonasal approach has become a valid surgical technique for the management of craniopharyngiomas. It provides an excellent corridor to infra- and supradiaphragmatic midline craniopharyngiomas, including the management of lesions extending into the third ventricle chamber. Even though indications for this approach are rigorously lesion based, the data in this study confirm its effectiveness in a large patient series.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hadad, G., Bassagasteguy, L., Carrau, R. L., Mataza, J. C., Kassam, A., Snyderman, C. H., & Mintz, A. (2006) · The Laryngoscope · doi:10.1097/01.mlg.0000234933.37779.e4 · Cited by 1,916
Total removal of craniopharyngiomas: Approaches and long-term results in 144 patients
Yaşargil, M. G., Curcic, M., Kis, M., Siegenthaler, G., Teddy, P. J., & Roth, P. (1990) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1990.73.1.0003 · Cited by 817
Surgical treatment of craniopharyngiomas: experience with 168 patients
Fahlbusch, R., Honegger, J., Paulus, W., Huk, W., & Buchfelder, M. (1999) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1999.90.2.0237 · Cited by 759
The descriptive epidemiology of craniopharyngioma
Bunin, G. R., Surawicz, T. S., Witman, P. A., Preston-Martin, S., Davis, F., & Bruner, J. M. (1998) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.1998.89.4.0547 · Cited by 687
Craniopharyngiomas in children and adults: systematic analysis of 121 cases with long-term follow-up
Karavitaki, N., Brufani, C., Warner, J. T., Adams, C. B. T., Richards, P., Ansorge, O., Shine, B., Turner, H. E., & Wass, J. A. H. (2005) · Clinical Endocrinology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2265.2005.02231.x · Cited by 633
Karavitaki, N., Cudlip, S., Adams, C. B. T., & Wass, J. A. H. (2006) · Endocrine Reviews · doi:10.1210/er.2006-0002 · Cited by 514
Craniopharyngioma in adults and children: a study of 122 surgical cases
Van Effenterre, R., & Boch, A.-L. (2002) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns.2002.97.1.0003 · Cited by 506
Kassam, A. B., Gardner, P. A., Snyderman, C. H., Carrau, R. L., Mintz, A. H., & Prevedello, D. M. (2008) · Journal of Neurosurgery · doi:10.3171/jns/2008/108/4/0715 · Cited by 462
Weiner, H. L., Wisoff, J. H., Rosenberg, M. E., Kupersmith, M. J., Cohen, H., Zagzag, D., Shiminski-Maher, T., Flamm, E. S., Epstein, F. J., & Miller, D. C. (1994) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1227/00006123-199412000-00001 · Cited by 373
Long-term Outcomes for Surgically Resected Craniopharyngiomas
Duff, J. M., Meyer, F. B., Ilstrup, D. M., Laws, E. R., Schleck, C. D., & Scheithauer, B. W. (2000) · Neurosurgery · doi:10.1097/00006123-200002000-00007 · Cited by 356
Cited by
Sleep Disorders in Patients With Craniopharyngioma: A Physiopathological and Practical Update
Romigi, A., Feola, T., Cappellano, S., De Angelis, M., Pio, G., Caccamo, M., Testa, F., Vitrani, G., Centonze, D., Colonnese, C., et al. (2022) · Frontiers in Neurology · doi:10.3389/fneur.2021.817257 · Cited by 28
Metadata
- Authors
- Cavallo, L. M., Frank, G., Cappabianca, P., Solari, D., Mazzatenta, D., Villa, A., Zoli, M., D'Enza, A. I., Esposito, F., & Pasquini, E.
- Venue
- Journal of Neurosurgery
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 100-113
- ISSN
- 0022-3085 (ISSN-L)
- 1933-0693
- OpenAlex
- W1551719856
- Cited by
- 280
- References
- 39
- FWCI
- 15.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients: Clinical article. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.3171/2014.3.jns131521
- The paper
- Cavallo, L. M., Frank, G., Cappabianca, P., Solari, D., Mazzatenta, D., Villa, A., Zoli, M., D'Enza, A. I., Esposito, F., & Pasquini, E. (2014). The endoscopic endonasal approach for the management of craniopharyngiomas: a series of 103 patients: Clinical article. Journal of Neurosurgery. https://doi.org/10.3171/2014.3.jns131521
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.