Professional Development FACTORS THAT MOTIVATE STAFF
Abstract
Although many studies identify theories on learning motivation, few analyze motivating factors and barriers from the staff nurse perspective. A study involving RNs from a pediatric and an intensive care nursing service reveals factors that influence or restrain nurses from participating in professional activities.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Previous research identified personal and contextual barriers to attending professional development activities, including inability to leave the unit due to patient care responsibilities, cost of conferences, difficulty getting time off, lack of managerial support, and child care or home responsibilities.
“Previous research has identified a number of personal and contextual barriers to attending professional development activities including the inability to leave their unit(s) due to patient care responsibilities (Dealy & Bass 1995), the cost of conferences (Dealy & Bass 1995, Harper 2000, Schweitzer & Krassa 2010), difficulty getting time off from work to attend (Schweitzer & Krassa 2010), lack of”
From Understanding skill acquisition among registered nurses: the ‘perpetual novice’ phenomenon (2015) · cites this paper as Dealy & Bass 1995
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Understanding skill acquisition among registered nurses: the ‘perpetual novice’ phenomenon
Wilson, B., Harwood, L., & Oudshoorn, A. (2015) · Journal of Clinical Nursing · doi:10.1111/jocn.12978 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
- Authors
- DEALY, M. F., & BASS, M.
- Affiliations
- Massachusetts General Hospital (US)
- Venue
- Nursing Management (Springhouse)
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 32J
- ISSN
- 0744-6314 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2074511216
- Cited by
- 13
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 1.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nursing Management (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Leadership and Management › Healthcare Education and Workforce Issues
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Innovations in Medical Education
- Keywords
- professional development, student motivation, staff nurses, barriers to participation, pediatric nursing, critical care nursing, nursing staff participation
- MeSH terms
- Education, Nursing, Continuing, Humans, Motivation, Nursing Staff, Hospital, Surveys and Questionnaires, Staff Development
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
