Cited by 6Urinary Bladder and Prostate ResearchPelvic floor disorders treatmentsCoffee research and impacts

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 13 of the 13 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Dietary Caffeine Intake and the Risk for Detrusor Instability: A Case-Control Study

ARYA, LILY A., MYERS, DEBORAH L., JACKSON, NEIL D.·2000·Obstetrics & Gynecology

Abstract

In Brief Objective To determine whether there is an association in women between caffeine intake and risk for detrusor instability. Methods Women were included if they had symptoms of urinary incontinence, completed a 48-hour voiding diary detailing fluid and caffeine intake, and had undergone standardized multichannel urodynamics. The study group had 131 women with detrusor instability on provocative cystometry and maximum urethral closure pressure greater than 20 cm of water. The control group had 128 women without detrusor instability on provocative cystometry and maximum urethral closure pressure greater than 20 cm of water. For statistical comparison, women were divided into the following three groups on the basis of caffeine intake: minimal (< 100 mg/day), moderate (100–400 mg/day), and high (> 400 mg/day). Results The mean caffeine intake of women with detrusor instability (484 ± 123 mg/day) was significantly higher than that of controls (194 ± 84 mg/day, P = .002). On univariate analysis, significant risk factors for detrusor instability were age, smoking status, and caffeine intake. On multivariate analysis, the statistically significant association between high caffeine intake and detrusor instability persisted after controlling for age and smoking (odds ratio [OR] 2.4, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1, 6.5, P = .018). When women with moderate caffeine intake were compared with those with minimal caffeine intake, the risk for detrusor instability was lower and did not reach significant levels (OR 1.5, 95% CI 0.1, 7.2, P = .093). Conclusion An association between high caffeine intake and detrusor instability was seen in this population. Larger studies are required to determine whether the association is causal. Excessive caffeine might increase the risk of detrusor instability.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006250-200007000-00018

Cites

13 of 13 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 13 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Boyle, 1984, J Natl Cancer Inst, 72, 1015

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
ARYA, L. A., MYERS, D. L., & JACKSON, N. D.
Affiliations
Brown University (US)
Venue
Obstetrics & Gynecology
Published
2000-07
Volume
96
Issue
1
Pages
85-89
ISSN
0029-7844 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4248414097
Cited by
6
References
13
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2017: 2
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Obstetrics and Gynecology (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Urinary Bladder and Prostate Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Urology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology (medical) › Coffee research and impacts
Keywords
dietary caffeine, detrusor overactivity, urinary incontinence, women, risk factors, smoking, age, voiding dysfunction, maximum urethral closure pressure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review