Cited by 119Pregnancy and Medication ImpactPregnancy and preeclampsia studiesReproductive System and Pregnancy

Nausea and Vomiting of Pregnancy: Endocrine Basis and Contribution to Pregnancy Outcome

Furneaux, Edwina C., Langley-Evans, Alison J., Langley-Evans, Simon C.·2001·Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey

Abstract

For a majority of women, nausea and vomiting of pregnancy (NVP) is an unpleasant but normal feature of pregnancy. NVP has a largely unknown etiology, but it is widely agreed that physiological, psychological, genetic, and cultural components are contributing factors. The occurrence of NVP may be of benefit in pregnancy, and NVP-associated pregnancies are less likely to result in miscarriage, preterm delivery, or intrauterine growth retardation. It has been suggested that NVP is promoted by secretion of human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG), largely on the basis of the coincidence between the onset of NVP and hCG secretion and the peaks of both at around 12 to 14 weeks’ gestation. Concentrations of hCG that are above or below the normal range are associated with poor pregnancy outcomes. It seems that NVP and hCG are related and that nutrient restriction during critical periods of embryonic development may ensure production of hCG at optimal levels, protect placental development, and optimize nutrient partitioning between maternal and fetal tissues. Target Audience: Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning Objectives: After completion of this article, the reader will be able to list potential associations with NVP, outline the various factors implied in the etiology of NVP, and describe the patterns of NVP.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006254-200112000-00004

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Furneaux, E. C., Langley-Evans, A. J., & Langley-Evans, S. C.
Affiliations
  • University of Nottingham (GB)
  • University of Northampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Furneaux, Edwina C.
Venue
Obstetrical and Gynecological Survey
Published
2001-12
Volume
56
Issue
12
Pages
775-782
ISSN
0029-7828 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2313597514
Cited by
119
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 7
FWCI
0.89
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Pregnancy and Medication Impact
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Immunology › Reproductive System and Pregnancy
Keywords
nausea and vomiting of pregnancy, human chorionic gonadotropin, etiology, pregnancy outcomes, miscarriage, preterm birth, fetal growth restriction, nutrient restriction, placental development
MeSH terms
Congenital Abnormalities, Abortion, Spontaneous, Alcohol Drinking, Caffeine, Female, Chorionic Gonadotropin, Humans, Hyperemesis Gravidarum, Nausea, Pregnancy, Pregnancy Complications, Pregnancy Outcome, Quality of Life, Risk Factors, Smoking, Vomiting

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review