The DOI matches its Crossref record.
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY
Abstract
This paper discusses a group of high-speed switching circuits using the basic current-switching mode Of operation. Existing literature has described the steady-state analysis of the basic current-switching. mode in performing numerous logical combinations. The first part of this paper presents a dynamic analysis of the basic current-switching mode. In previous work the assumption has been made thatthe dynamic (cid:9) . switching characteristic of the circuit Is that of a common-base amplifier with a current step applied to the emitter. When linear analysis techniques are used to find the natural frequen-des present in the circuit, such an assumption argues that the gain-bandwidth product is the dominant natural frequency and therefore determines the switching time. This paper shows that the basic current-switching mode is really an overdriven amplifier in a common-emitter configuration. Therefore the dominant natural frequency, which determines the switching time, Is actually f, the short-circuit cutoff frequency in the common-emitter configuration. The comparison of switching-time estimates and experimental measurements,, considering only the gain-bandwidth product, often shows agreement within loss than a factor of two. The paper presents the reasons for this conformity but describes the errors introduced by considering the gain-bandwidth product alone.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mulnard, R. A., Cotman, C. W., Kawas, C., van Dyck, C. H., Sano, M., Doody, R., Koss, E., Pfeiffer, E., Jin, S., Gamst, A., et al. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.8.1007 · Cited by 991
Modeling Transport in Polymer-Electrolyte Fuel Cells
Weber, A. Z., & Newman, J. (2004) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr020729l · Cited by 738
Crystal Structures of Molecular Gold Nanocrystal Arrays
Whetten, R. L., Shafigullin, M. N., Khoury, J. T., Schaaff, T. G., Vezmar, I., Alvarez, M. M., & Wilkinson, A. (1999) · Accounts of Chemical Research · doi:10.1021/ar970239t · Cited by 580
Gas-Phase Conformation of Biological Molecules: Bradykinin
Wyttenbach, T., von Helden, G., & Bowers, M. T. (1996) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja9535928 · Cited by 384
Minoofar, P. N., Dunn, B. S., & Zink, J. I. (2005) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja045185e · Cited by 128
Metadata
- Authors
- STODDARD, K. B.
- Venue
- Optometry and Vision Science
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1948-05
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 242-243
- ISSN
- 1040-5488 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1992067978
- Cited by
- 534
- References
- 0
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006324-194805000-00008
- The paper
- STODDARD, K. B. (1948). UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA: SCHOOL OF OPTOMETRY. Optometry and Vision Science. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006324-194805000-00008
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.