Cited by 73Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug ReactionsVirology and Viral DiseasesBacterial Infections and Vaccines

Risk of hospitalization because of aseptic meningitis after measles-mumps-rubella vaccination in one- to two-year-old children: an analysis of the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) Project

BLACK, STEVEN, SHINEFIELD, HENRY, RAY, PAULA, LEWIS, EDWIN, CHEN, ROBERT, GLASSER, JOHN, HADLER, STEVEN, HARDY, JANET +10 more·1997·The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the level of increased risk, if any, of hospitalizations for aseptic meningitis after Jeryl-Lynn mumps strain measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine in the Vaccine Safety Datalink population. STUDY DESIGN: A possible increased risk of aseptic meningitis 8 to 14 days after receipt of MMR was observed in a preliminary screening analysis of automated data from the Vaccine Safety Datalink (VSD) project Year 2 analysis. To further evaluate this association a retrospective 10-year matched case-control study was undertaken in the four health maintenance organizations (HMOs) in the VSD project. Cases ascertained from a broad scan of the automated data were validated against a standard case definition. Two controls matched on age, sex, HMO and HMO membership were assigned per case. RESULTS: The VSD project involves the cooperative collection of automated vaccination and medical outcome data from four large HMOs that currently have 500,000 children younger than 7 years of age under surveillance. Review of automated screening results from the first 2 years of data revealed a possible increased risk of aseptic meningitis 0 to 14 days after MMR with a relative risk of 3.61 (95% confidence interval, 1.0 to 13.1) although the total number of cases was small. Although the automated data had suggested a possible association of aseptic meningitis with MMR containing the Jeryl-Lynn strain of mumps, review of validated hospitalized cases during the observation period did not reveal evidence of an increased risk of aseptic meningitis after MMR containing the Jeryl-Lynn strain of mumps (odds ratio < 1.0 for all analyses). CONCLUSION: Although it is recognized that hospitalized cases represent a minority of the total cases of aseptic meningitis, it is reassuring that in this evaluation no increased risk of aseptic meningitis after MMR vaccine was found.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006454-199705000-00009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In Black 1997, exposure to MMR vaccine was not statistically different between cases and controls for aseptic meningitis in any of the considered time intervals (0 to 14 days, 0 to 30 days, 8 to 14 days).

    “Exposure to the MMR vaccine was not statistically different between cases and controls in any of the considered time intervals.”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Black 1997

  • In Black 1997 there was a moderate likelihood of selection bias because of missing cases and their records (up to 27%).

    “In Black 1997 there was a moderate likelihood of selection bias because of missing cases and their records (up to 27%) but the study and its methods were well reported.”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Black 1997

  • In Black 1997 and Davis 2001, the risk of bias was low.

    “Low risk of bias: two studies (Black 1997; Davis 2001).”

    From Vaccines for measles, mumps and rubella in children (2012) · cites this paper as Black 1997

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
BLACK, S., SHINEFIELD, H., RAY, P., LEWIS, E., CHEN, R., GLASSER, J., HADLER, S., HARDY, J., RHODES, P., SWINT, E., DAVIS, R., THOMPSON, R., MULLOOLY, J., MARCY, M., VADHEIM, C., WARD, J., RASTOGI, S., & WISE, R.
Affiliations
Group Health Cooperative (US)
Venue
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
1997-05
Volume
16
Issue
5
Pages
500-503
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1999970131
Cited by
73
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
5.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics › Toxicology › Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Virology and Viral Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
Keywords
aseptic meningitis, MMR vaccine, vaccine safety, hospitalization risk, infants and toddlers, vaccine adverse events
MeSH terms
Child, Preschool, Female, Health Maintenance Organizations, Hospitalization, Humans, Infant, Male, Measles Vaccine, Meningitis, Aseptic, Mumps Vaccine, Registries, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Rubella Vaccine, Statistics as Topic, United States, Incidence, Confidence Intervals, Case-Control Studies, Vaccines, Combined, Measles-Mumps-Rubella Vaccine

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review