Cited by 135Antifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal Infections and StudiesNeonatal and Maternal Infections

Liposomal amphotericin B treatment for neonatal fungal infections

SCARCELLA, ALDA, PASQUARIELLO, MARIA B., GIUGLIANO, BRUNELLA, VENDEMMIA, MARIA, DE LUCIA, AMALIA·1998·The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Disseminated fungal infections are a major problem in high risk neonates. Conventional antifungal agents are often unsatisfactory and have a high incidence of severe adverse effects. METHODS: We administered liposomal encapsulated amphotericin B (AmBisome), which is an alternative to conventional amphotericin B, to 40 preterm (mean birth weight, 1090 +/- 313.6 g; mean gestational age, 28.35 +/- 2.13 weeks) and 4 full term (mean birth weight, 3080 +/- 118 g; mean gestational age, 39 +/- 0.7 weeks) newborn infants with a severe fungal infection. RESULTS: Candida albicans was the most frequent fungus isolated (70%). The duration of intravenous AmBisome therapy ranged from 7 to 49 days; the cumulative dose ranged from 7 to 138.8 mg/kg (median, 45.2 mg/kg). Administration of AmBisome was effective in 72.7% of patients; 5 of 6 cases of meningitis also recovered; 63.6% of 33 very low birth weight infants survived. No side effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge this is the largest study of the treatment of neonates with liposomal amphotericin B, and the results confirm its effectiveness and safety. However, randomized clinical trials are required to establish the most effective administration protocol for AmBisome, i.e. the starting dosage, the maximum effective dosage and the cumulative dosage, and to verify whether the preparation should be associated with another antifungal agent.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006454-199802000-00013

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Liposomal amphotericin B was used successfully in 5 of 6 cases of Candida meningitis in newborn infants.

    “Liposomal amphotericin B was used successfully in 5 of 6 cases of Candida meningitis in newborn infants [235].”

    From Guidelines for Treatment of Candidiasis (2004) · cites this paper as [235]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
SCARCELLA, A., PASQUARIELLO, M. B., GIUGLIANO, B., VENDEMMIA, M., & DE LUCIA, A.
Affiliations
Federico II University Hospital (IT)
Venue
The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal
Published
1998-02
Volume
17
Issue
2
Pages
146-148
ISSN
0891-3668 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2036887186
Cited by
135
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 5 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.29
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Neonatal and Maternal Infections
Keywords
liposomal amphotericin B, neonatal fungal infection, disseminated fungal infection, preterm infants, Candida albicans, fungal meningitis, antifungal therapy, treatment efficacy and safety, very low birth weight infants
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Infant, Premature, Infant, Premature, Diseases, Liposomes, Mycoses

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review