The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Treatment of Facial Rhytides with a High-Energy Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser
Abstract
Facial rhytides are a common problem that often presents for treatment. Because of the tendency for rhytides to involve delicate tissue areas, traditional treatment modalities have been limited by complications of scarring or pigmentary alterations. With the advent of the new-generation high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide lasers, skin requiring resurfacing can now be treated successfully with minimal risk and side effects. This study included 259 patients with facial rhytides (104 perioral, 83 periorbital, 53 glabellar, and 17 forehead). Each patient received treatment with a high-energy pulsed CO2 laser system, and individual responses were evaluated independently by two blinded assessors at 1, 4, 8, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. While clinical response rates were uniformly excellent, they varied in different locations. On average, there was a 90 percent improvement in all areas under study. The periorbital regions responded best, an average 93 percent improvement being seen. The facial rhytides with the lowest response rates (86.8 percent) were those which were most severe and those caused by excessive muscle movement (i.e., frown lines at the glabella). No incidences of scarring were noted, but erythema persisting 1 to 3 months (mean 2.2 months) following laser irradiation was typical. Transient postinflammatory hyperpigmentation of 3 months' average duration was seen in 30 percent of patients and was not limited to those individuals with darker skin tones. The high-energy pulsed carbon dioxide laser is a safe and effective treatment for facial rhytides. Treatment can be delivered in an outpatient setting without the need for general anesthesia, and preliminary evidence suggests long-lasting results.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ganceviciene, R., Liakou, A. I., Theodoridis, A., Makrantonaki, E., & Zouboulis, C. C. (2012) · Dermato-Endocrinology · doi:10.4161/derm.22804 · Cited by 844
The spectrum of laser skin resurfacing: Nonablative, fractional, and ablative laser resurfacing
Alexiades-Armenakas, M. R., Dover, J. S., & Arndt, K. A. (2008) · Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology · doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2008.01.003 · Cited by 580
Complications of Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing. An Evaluation of 500 Patients
NANNI, C. A., & ALSTER, T. S. (1998) · Dermatologic Surgery · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04161.x · Cited by 489
Self-citationAlster, T. S. (1999) · Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery · doi:10.1097/00006534-199902000-00040 · Cited by 254
Self-citationComplications of Ablative and Nonablative Lasers and Light Sources
Tanzi, E. L., & Alster, T. S. (2008) · Complications in Cutaneous Surgery · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-73152-0_13 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Alster, T. S., & Garg, S.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 1996-10
- Volume
- 98
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 791-794
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2078945420
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Treatment of Facial Rhytides with a High-Energy Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006534-199610000-00005
- The paper
- Alster, T. S., & Garg, S. (1996). Treatment of Facial Rhytides with a High-Energy Pulsed Carbon Dioxide Laser. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-199610000-00005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.