Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 489

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Complications of Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing. An Evaluation of 500 Patients

NANNI, CHRISTOPHER A., ALSTER, TINA S.·1998·Dermatologic Surgery

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cutaneous laser resurfacing with high-energy, pulsed and scanned carbon dioxide (CO2) lasers has become popularized for the treatment of a variety of cutaneous indications, but potential complications and side effects remain a large concern. Despite the recent boom in cutaneous laser resurfacing procedures, there remains a relative paucity of written information documenting laser complication rates. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to identify and report the complications that occurred after cutaneous CO2 laser resurfacing within a large patient population. METHODS: A retrospective analysis and chart review was performed in 500 consecutive patients who underwent cutaneous laser resurfacing of 1589 facial regions with the UltraPulse CO2 laser by a single operator. Side effects and complications relating to infection, postoperative healing, pigmentary changes, and scarring were tabulated. RESULTS: The most common complication observed was postoperative erythema, which occurred in all patients, lasting an average of 4.5 months. Hyperpigmentation was seen in 37% of patients with a higher rate in darker skin phototypes. Acne flares, milia formation, and dermatitis occurred in 10-15% of patients. Postoperative infection with herpes simplex virus (HSV) was observed in 7.4% regardless of prior HSV history. Hypopigmentation, scarring, and other local or disseminated infections occurred in < 1% of this study population. CONCLUSIONS: Cutaneous CO2 laser resurfacing is a relatively safe procedure with a low complication profile. Proper laser treatment protocol and postoperative management is important in reducing side effects and complications.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04161.x

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 11 references

Cited by

See all 489

Metadata

Authors
NANNI, C. A., & ALSTER, T. S.
Venue
Dermatologic Surgery
Published
1998-03
Volume
24
Issue
3
Pages
315-320
ISSN
1076-0512 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2063759078
Cited by
489
References
11
FWCI
26.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Complications of Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing. An Evaluation of 500 Patients. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04161.x
The paper
NANNI, C. A., & ALSTER, T. S. (1998). Complications of Carbon Dioxide Laser Resurfacing. An Evaluation of 500 Patients. Dermatologic Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1524-4725.1998.tb04161.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.