The DOI matches its Crossref record; 41 of the 41 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prospective Analysis of Psychosocial Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: One-Year Postoperative Results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study
Abstract
In the past decade, changing attitudes toward breast reconstruction among both patients and providers have led a growing number of women to seek breast reconstruction after mastectomy. Although investigators have documented the psychological, social, emotional, and functional benefits of breast reconstruction, little research has evaluated the effects of procedure choice on these outcomes. The current study prospectively evaluated and compared psychosocial outcomes for three common options for mastectomy reconstruction: tissue expander/implant, pedicle TRAM, and free TRAM techniques. In a prospective cohort design, patients undergoing postmastectomy reconstruction for the first time with expander/implant, pedicle TRAM, or free TRAM procedures were recruited from 12 centers and 23 plastic surgeons in the United States and Canada. Before reconstruction and at 1 year after reconstruction, patients were evaluated by a battery of questionnaires consisting of both generic and condition-specific surveys. Outcomes assessed included emotional well-being, vitality, general mental health, social functioning, functional well-being, social well-being, and body image. Baseline (preoperative) scores and the change in scores (the difference between postoperative and preoperative scores) were compared across procedure types using t tests and analysis of covariance. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative surveys were obtained from 273 patients. Procedure type was reported in 250 patients, of whom 56 received implant reconstructions, 128 pedicle TRAM flaps, and 66 free TRAM flaps. A total of 161 immediate and 89 delayed reconstructions were performed. Among women receiving immediate reconstruction, significant improvements were observed in all psychosocial variables except body image. However, no significant effects of procedure type on these changes over time existed. Similarly, delayed reconstruction patients had significant increases in emotional well-being, vitality, general mental health, functional well-being, and body image. Although the choice of reconstructive technique did not significantly impact most of these outcomes, significant differences existed among procedure types for three psychosocial subscales. Patients undergoing delayed expander/implant reconstructions reported greater improvements in vitality and social well-being relative to women receiving delayed TRAM procedures. By contrast, delayed TRAM patients noted significantly greater gains in body image compared with women choosing delayed expander-implant reconstruction. The authors conclude that both immediate and delayed breast reconstructions provide substantial psychosocial benefits for mastectomy patients. Although the choice of reconstructive procedure does not seem to significantly affect improvements in psychosocial status with immediate reconstruction, our data suggest that procedure type does have a significant effect on gains in vitality and body image for women undergoing delayed reconstruction.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1992) · PubMed · Cited by 33,716
The MOS 36-ltem Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): I. Conceptual Framework and Item Selection
Ware, J. E., & Sherbourne, C. D. (1992) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-199206000-00002 · Cited by 30,033
The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: development and validation of the general measure
Cella, D. F., Tulsky, D. S., Gray, G., Sarafian, B., Linn, E., Bonomi, A., Silberman, M., Yellen, S. B., Winicour, P., & Brannon, J. (1993) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.1993.11.3.570 · Cited by 6,020
The MOS Short-form General Health Survey: Reliability and Validity in a Patient Population
Stewart, A. L., Hays, R. D., & Ware, J. E. (1988) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198807000-00007 · Cited by 3,339
Generic and Disease-Specific Measures in Assessing Health Status and Quality of Life
Patrick, D. L., & Deyo, R. A. (1989) · Medical Care · doi:10.1097/00005650-198903001-00018 · Cited by 1,790
(1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806093182327 · Cited by 696
Ellwood, P. M. (1988) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejm198806093182329 · Cited by 589
Psychological and social adjustment to mastectomy.A two-year follow-up study
Morris, T., Steven Greer, H., & White, P. (1977) · Cancer · doi:10.1002/1097-0142(197711)40:5<2381::aid-cncr2820400555>3.0.co;2-b · Cited by 432
EFFECTS OF IMMEDIATE BREAST RECONSTRUCTION ON PSYCHOSOCIAL MORBIDITY AFTER MASTECTOMY
Dean, C., Chetty, U., & Forrest, A. P. M. (1983) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(83)91452-6 · Cited by 400
Psychosocial correlates of breast cancer and its treatments.
Meyerowitz, B. E. (1980) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.87.1.108 · Cited by 331
Cited by
Parker, P. A., Youssef, A., Walker, S., Basen-Engquist, K., Cohen, L., Gritz, E. R., Wei, Q. X., & Robb, G. L. (2007) · Annals of Surgical Oncology · doi:10.1245/s10434-007-9413-9 · Cited by 302
Impact of Radiotherapy on Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes After Breast Reconstruction
Jagsi, R., Momoh, A. O., Qi, J., Hamill, J. B., Billig, J., Kim, H. M., Pusic, A. L., & Wilkins, E. G. (2018) · JNCI: Journal of the National Cancer Institute · doi:10.1093/jnci/djx148 · Cited by 285
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Wilkins, E. G., Cederna, P. S., Lowery, J. C., Davis, J. A., Kim, H. M., Roth, R. S., Goldfarb, S., Izenberg, P. H., Houin, H. P., & Shaheen, K. W.
- Venue
- Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 106
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 1014-1025
- ISSN
- 0032-1052 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1969342421
- Cited by
- 461
- References
- 41
- FWCI
- 5.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prospective Analysis of Psychosocial Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: One-Year Postoperative Results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00006534-200010000-00010
- The paper
- Wilkins, E. G., Cederna, P. S., Lowery, J. C., Davis, J. A., Kim, H. M., Roth, R. S., Goldfarb, S., Izenberg, P. H., Houin, H. P., & Shaheen, K. W. (2000). Prospective Analysis of Psychosocial Outcomes in Breast Reconstruction: One-Year Postoperative Results from the Michigan Breast Reconstruction Outcome Study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006534-200010000-00010
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.