Cited by 66Bacterial Infections and VaccinesInfectious Encephalopathies and EncephalitisBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

Signs of meningeal irritation at the emergency department: How often bacterial meningitis?

OOSTENBRINK, RIANNE, MOONS, KAREL G.M., THEUNISSEN, CHANTAL C.W., DERKSEN-LUBSEN, GERARDA, GROBBEE, DIEDERICK E., MOLL, HENRIËTTE A.·2001·Pediatric Emergency Care

Abstract

Objective Although signs of meningeal irritation are highly indicative of meningitis, they are not pathognomonic. In this study, we described the final diagnoses in children with signs of meningeal irritation, and we assessed the frequency of bacterial meningitis related to specific signs of meningeal irritation. Methods Information was collected from records of 326 patients (aged 1 month to 15 years) who visited the emergency department of the Sophia Children's Hospital between 1988 and 1998 with signs of meningeal irritation, assessed by either the general practitioner or the pediatrician. Results Bacterial meningitis was diagnosed in 99 patients (30%), viral or aseptic meningitis in 43 (13%). Other diagnoses were pneumonia (8%), other serious bacterial infections (2%), and upper respiratory tract infections or other self-limiting diseases (46 %). Presence of one of the signs of meningeal irritation assessed by the pediatrician was related to bacterial meningitis in 39%. Specific tests eliciting meningeal irritation, such as Brudzinski's and Kernig's signs, were not related to a higher frequency of bacterial meningitis than neck stiffness and the tripod phenomenon. In children Conclusion Bacterial meningitis is present in 30% of children with signs of meningeal irritation. Presence of meningeal irritation as assessed by the pediatrician is related to bacterial meningitis in 39%. A better prediction of bacterial meningitis was not achieved by using more specific tests for si…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006565-200106000-00003

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
OOSTENBRINK, R., MOONS, K. G. M., THEUNISSEN, C. C. W., DERKSEN-LUBSEN, G., GROBBEE, D. E., & MOLL, H. A.
Affiliations
Utrecht University (NL)
Venue
Pediatric Emergency Care
Published
2001-06
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
161-164
ISSN
0749-5161 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2040563075
Cited by
66
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
2.66
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pediatric Emergency Care (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • EUR Research Repository (Erasmus University Rotterdam) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Immunology and Microbiology › Microbiology › Bacterial Infections and Vaccines
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Infectious Encephalopathies and Encephalitis
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
meningeal irritation, bacterial meningitis, children, viral meningitis, aseptic meningitis, Kernig's sign, neck stiffness, irritability, diagnostic yield, emergency department
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Hospitals, Pediatric, Humans, Infant, Male, Meningism, Meningitis, Aseptic, Meningitis, Viral, Netherlands, Respiratory Tract Infections, Meningitis, Bacterial

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review