ALLOGENIC FETAL RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIAL CELL TRANSPLANT IN A PATIENT WITH GEOGRAPHIC ATROPY
Abstract
Purpose: To test the hypothesis that healthy fetal retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) can rescue the remaining viable RPE and choriocapillaries and thereby the photoreceptors in non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) (geographic atrophy [GA]). Methods: A 65-year-old legally blind woman with non-neovascular ARMD underwent fetal RPE transplantation. Best-corrected visual acuity testing, detailed fundus examination, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, scanning laser ophthalmoscope macular perimetry, and humoral and cellular immune response testing were performed. A suspension of RPE was infused into the subretinal space through a retinotomy along the superotemporal arcade at the edge of the area of GA. The patient did not take systemic immunosuppressants. Results: The patient's vision remained unchanged for 5 months after the surgery. Fluorescein angiography after transplantation showed leakage and staining at the level of the outer retina. There was progressive subretinal fibrosis in the area of the transplant. Immune response studies showed a weakly positive mixed lymphocyte response against phosducin and rhodopsin. Conclusion: Although it is surgically feasible to transplant fetal RPE to the subretinal space of patients with GA, such an allogenic RPE transplant without immunosuppression leads to leakage on fluorescein angiography and eventual fibrosis. A very weak immune response against proteins associated with photoreceptors is also of concern.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Clinical trials using allogenic RPE cells for the treatment of AMD two decades ago were all met with graft rejection.
“clinical trials conducted using allogenic RPE cells for the treatment of AMD, 2 decades ago, were all met with graft rejection (38–42).”
From Subretinal therapy: technological solutions to surgical and immunological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [42]
Immune responses are commonly observed using viral vectors and with mRNA transfections.
“Immune responses are also commonly observed using viral vectors and with mRNA transfections (42–44).”
From Subretinal therapy: technological solutions to surgical and immunological challenges (2022) · cites this paper as [42]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Subretinal therapy: technological solutions to surgical and immunological challenges
Ladha, R., Caspers, L. E., Willermain, F., & de Smet, M. D. (2022) · Frontiers in Medicine · doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.846782 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
- Authors
- WEISZ, J. M., HUMAYUN, M. S., JUAN, E. D., CERRO, M. D., SUNNESS, J. S., DAGNELIE, G., SOYLU, M., RIZZO, L., & NUSSENBLATT, R. B.
- Affiliations
- National Institutes of Health (US)
- University of Rochester Medicine (US)
- Corresponding author
- WEISZ, JAMES M.
- HUMAYUN, MARK S.
- SUNNESS, JANET S.
- DAGNELIE, GISLIN
- Venue
- Retina
- Published
- 1999
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 540-545
- ISSN
- 0275-004X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4234164581
- Cited by
- 5
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Retina (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
- Keywords
- allogeneic cell transplantation, geographic atrophy, non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration, subretinal injection, retinotomy, subretinal fibrosis, fluorescein angiography leakage, mixed lymphocyte reaction, phosducin, rhodopsin, photoreceptors, immune response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review