Cited by 5Retinal Diseases and TreatmentsRetinal Development and DisordersRetinal and Macular Surgery

ALLOGENIC FETAL RETINAL PIGMENT EPITHELIAL CELL TRANSPLANT IN A PATIENT WITH GEOGRAPHIC ATROPY

WEISZ, JAMES M., HUMAYUN, MARK S., JUAN, EUGENE DE, CERRO, MANUEL DEL, SUNNESS, JANET S., DAGNELIE, GISLIN, SOYLU, MERIH, RIZZO, LUIS +1 more·1999·Retina

Abstract

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that healthy fetal retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) can rescue the remaining viable RPE and choriocapillaries and thereby the photoreceptors in non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration (ARMD) (geographic atrophy [GA]). Methods: A 65-year-old legally blind woman with non-neovascular ARMD underwent fetal RPE transplantation. Best-corrected visual acuity testing, detailed fundus examination, fundus photography, fluorescein angiography, scanning laser ophthalmoscope macular perimetry, and humoral and cellular immune response testing were performed. A suspension of RPE was infused into the subretinal space through a retinotomy along the superotemporal arcade at the edge of the area of GA. The patient did not take systemic immunosuppressants. Results: The patient's vision remained unchanged for 5 months after the surgery. Fluorescein angiography after transplantation showed leakage and staining at the level of the outer retina. There was progressive subretinal fibrosis in the area of the transplant. Immune response studies showed a weakly positive mixed lymphocyte response against phosducin and rhodopsin. Conclusion: Although it is surgically feasible to transplant fetal RPE to the subretinal space of patients with GA, such an allogenic RPE transplant without immunosuppression leads to leakage on fluorescein angiography and eventual fibrosis. A very weak immune response against proteins associated with photoreceptors is also of concern.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00006982-199919060-00011

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
WEISZ, J. M., HUMAYUN, M. S., JUAN, E. D., CERRO, M. D., SUNNESS, J. S., DAGNELIE, G., SOYLU, M., RIZZO, L., & NUSSENBLATT, R. B.
Affiliations
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
  • University of Rochester Medicine (US)
Corresponding author
  • WEISZ, JAMES M.
  • HUMAYUN, MARK S.
  • SUNNESS, JANET S.
  • DAGNELIE, GISLIN
Venue
Retina
Published
1999
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
540-545
ISSN
0275-004X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4234164581
Cited by
5
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
FWCI
0.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Retina (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Ophthalmology › Retinal Diseases and Treatments
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Retinal and Macular Surgery
Keywords
allogeneic cell transplantation, geographic atrophy, non-neovascular age-related macular degeneration, subretinal injection, retinotomy, subretinal fibrosis, fluorescein angiography leakage, mixed lymphocyte reaction, phosducin, rhodopsin, photoreceptors, immune response

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review