Cited by 56Herpesvirus Infections and TreatmentsGenital Health and DiseaseCytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 19 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Patients’ Preference of Valacyclovir Once-Daily Suppressive Therapy Versus Twice-Daily Episodic Therapy for Recurrent Genital Herpes: A Randomized Study

ROMANOWSKI, BARBARA, MARINA, RAYMOND B., ROBERTS, JEREMY N.·2003·Sexually Transmitted Diseases

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Valacyclovir is effective for suppressive and episodic treatment of recurrent genital herpes. Few data on patients' treatment strategy preferences are available. GOAL: The goal was to assess patients' preference, satisfaction, and quality of life with suppressive versus episodic treatment of recurrent genital herpes. STUDY DESIGN: This was a multicenter, open-label, randomized, two-arm, crossover 48-week study involving 225 patients with genital herpes. RESULTS: Suppressive valacyclovir therapy was preferred to episodic valacyclovir treatment by 72% of patients (P < 0.001). Overall treatment satisfaction and quality of life were significantly greater during suppressive therapy (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). The risk of recurrence during the first 24 weeks was reduced by 78% with suppressive therapy (P < 0.001). Significantly fewer patients experienced recurrences during suppressive treatment than with episodic treatment (P < 0.001). Valacyclovir was well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: Suppressive valacyclovir was preferred to episodic therapy by most patients. Suppressive therapy was associated with increased treatment satisfaction, and decreased risk and lower frequency of recurrences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007435-200303000-00010

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 19 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Goldmeier, 1988, Genitourin Med, 64, 327
  2. Emmert, 2000, Am Fam Phys, 61, 1697
  3. Patel, 1997, Genitourin Med, 73, 105
  4. Bodsworth, 1997, Genitourin Med, 73, 110
  5. Kaplan, 1958, J Am Stat Assoc, 53, 457, 10.2307/2281868 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Cox, 1972, J R Stat Soc, 187
  7. Jeffries, 1994, Antiviral Chem Chemother, 5, 23

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 56

Metadata

Authors
ROMANOWSKI, B., MARINA, R. B., & ROBERTS, J. N.
Affiliations
  • University of Alberta (CA)
  • GlaxoSmithKline (Canada) (CA)
Corresponding author
ROMANOWSKI, BARBARA
Venue
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
Published
2003-03
Volume
30
Issue
3
Pages
226-231
ISSN
0148-5717 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2054592903
Cited by
56
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 1
FWCI
3.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Sexually Transmitted Diseases (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Herpesvirus Infections and Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Cytomegalovirus and herpesvirus research
Keywords
recurrent genital herpes, valacyclovir, suppressive therapy, patient preferences, treatment satisfaction, quality of life, recurrent herpes, antiviral therapy
MeSH terms
Valacyclovir, Acyclovir, Administration, Oral, Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Antiviral Agents, Canada, Drug Administration Schedule, Female, Herpes Genitalis, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Quality of Life, Recurrence, Valine, Treatment Outcome, Patient Satisfaction, Cross-Over Studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review