Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 197

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care for Low-Back Pain

DEYO, RICHARD A., DIEHL, ANDREW K.·1986·Spine

Abstract

Because patient satisfaction with medical care for back pain is an important outcome and may correlate with compliance or other outcomes, the authors devised a brief (9-item) satisfaction scale and demonstrated its reliability and validity. The most frequently cited source of dissatisfaction among 140 patients with mechanical low-back pain (LBP) was failure to receive an adequate explanation of the problem. Compared with patients who reported an adequate explanation, those who did not wanted more diagnostic tests, were less satisfied with their visit, and were less likely to want the same doctor again. Receiving an adequate explanation was not associated with more tests or physician time. Thus, explanation of symptoms has a high priority among patients with LBP, and this need should be explicitly acknowledged and addressed by their physicians.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1097/00007632-198601000-00008

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 197

Metadata

Authors
DEYO, R. A., & DIEHL, A. K.
Venue
Spine
Published
1986-01
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
28-30
ISSN
0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2062025845
Cited by
197
References
0
FWCI
2.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care for Low-Back Pain. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-198601000-00008
The paper
DEYO, R. A., & DIEHL, A. K. (1986). Patient Satisfaction with Medical Care for Low-Back Pain. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-198601000-00008

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.