The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Study Using Physical Examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed on 37 patients with acute spinal injury using T1− and T2-weighted images. Three different types of MRI signal patterns were detected in association with these spinal cord injuries. A classification was developed using these three patterns. Type I, seen in ten (27.0%) of the patients, demonstrated a decreased signal intensity consistent with acute intraspinal hemorrhage. Type II, seen in 16 (43.2%) of the patients, demonstrated a bright signal intensity consistent with acute cord edema. Type III, seen in three (8.1%) of the patients, demonstrated a mixed signal of hypointensity centrally and hyperintensity peripherally consistent with contusion. The remaining eight patients had normal cords by MRI. All 37 patients had an admitting neurologic assessment and classification of their spinal injury according to the Frankel classification and the Trauma Motor Index (TMI). At an average of 12.1 months postinjury, their neurologic function was reassessed. Patients with Type I patterns showed no improvement in their Frankel classification and minimal improvement in their TMI, 32.1 to 42.4. In comparison, all of the Type II and III patterns improved at least one Frankel classification. The Type II TMI increased from 70.8 to 91.9 and Type III from 37.3 to 75.7. This preliminary report indicates a distinct correlation between the pattern of spinal cord injury as identified by MRI and neurologic recovery. It appears that the ability of MRI to aid in examination of the condition of the spinal cord will offer a means of predicting neurologic recovery following acute spinal cord injury.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Ahuja, C. S., Wilson, J. R., Nori, S., Kotter, M. R. N., Druschel, C., Curt, A., & Fehlings, M. G. (2017) · Nature Reviews Disease Primers · doi:10.1038/nrdp.2017.18 · Cited by 2,441
Miyanji, F., Furlan, J. C., Aarabi, B., Arnold, P. M., & Fehlings, M. G. (2007) · Radiology · doi:10.1148/radiol.2433060583 · Cited by 403
Trauma der Wirbelsäule: erste Hilfe durch Schnittbildverfahren
Schueller, G., & Schueller-Weidekamm, C. (2014) · Der Radiologe · doi:10.1007/s00117-013-2639-6
Metadata
- Authors
- BONDURANT, F. J., COTLER, H. B., KULKARNI, M. V., McARDLE, C. B., & HARRIS, J. H.
- Venue
- Spine
- Published
- 1990-03
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 161-168
- ISSN
- 0362-2436 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4292690358
- Cited by
- 178
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 4.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Study Using Physical Examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1097/00007632-199003000-00002
- The paper
- BONDURANT, F. J., COTLER, H. B., KULKARNI, M. V., McARDLE, C. B., & HARRIS, J. H. (1990). Acute Spinal Cord Injury: A Study Using Physical Examination and Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Spine. https://doi.org/10.1097/00007632-199003000-00002
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.